My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/11/1988 Meeting (2)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1988
>
01/11/1988 Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 3:27:30 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:26:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/11/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Sercombe said information must be submitted 50 days prior to the <br />election date for inclusion in the pamphlets which are then mailed to <br />voters approximately two weeks before the election. Mr. Holmer said the <br />cost is about $6,500 per measure. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten told members of the audience that the council is referring two <br />versions to voters because it has been unable to agree on anyone <br />ordinance. She said she is in support of a May election. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie said he also is in favor of giving voters two measures to <br />consider. He said to put only one proposal on the ballot would force a <br />significant amount of people to choose an issue they did not originally <br />vote for. He added it is time to reach a conclusion on the issue. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom said she prefers a May election date because of the cost <br />involved in a special March election. She said the primary difference <br />between the two measures is the scope of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman asked other councilors if they had received feedback about the <br />council IS proposal to put only one of the task force's recommendations on <br />the ballot and substitute the other with a measure modeled after the Lane <br />County ordinance. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said she has not recently received feedback from task force <br />members. She noted that both the MRV and a second version proposed by <br />Mr. Bennett were both voted upon by the task force. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason said the council at this point can take a straw vote on the <br />issue and reaffirm the vote during its regular meeting beginning at 7:30 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman verified that the MRV has an appointed board rather than an <br />elected board. The council agreed to conduct a straw poll on the issue <br />of what proposals to forward to staff for finalization. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman moved, seconded by Mr. Holmer, to direct the <br />City Attorneyls office to prepare documents referring to <br />the voters Nuclear Free Zone Ordinance proposals A and C <br />(as presented) at this meeting for the May 17 <br />primary election ballot. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom said she noted discreet disapprovals from audience members <br />over the comment that there will be an appointed rather than elected <br />Nuclear Free Zone Board to oversee the ordinance. She said the <br />restrictions that would be placed on board appointees satisfy her that <br />the board will be effective proponents of the measure. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 11, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.