Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />failures. He said installation of a sewer extension along Willow Creek <br />Road would be needed and would occur only if warranted. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom asked about the constitutionality of island annexations. City <br />Attorney Tim Sercombe said he preferred to provide detailed legal <br />background in written form. He said he thought reasons existed to <br />distinguish island annexations from the Court of Appeals decision on <br />triple majority annexations. He said it was his judgment that the <br />council should treat the present statute that had been re-enacted by the <br />1987 Legislature as constitutional and should not try to conclude or <br />suppose that a court would hold it unconstitutional. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Sercombe said he did not believe that the Court of Appeals decision, <br />which held that the triple-majority process giving to property owners <br />different procedural rights than it gave to residents in an annexing area <br />violated Article I, Section 20 of the Oregon Constitution, the equal <br />privileges and immunities clause. He said island annexations involved no <br />disparity of rights between property owners and residents. He said the <br />statute clearly gave the City the right to annex an area by order of the <br />Boundary Commission without the ability of property owners to petition <br />for an election. Because island annexations did not have the same <br />constitutional infirmity as identified by the court in triple-majority <br />annexations, Mr. Sercombe said he did not believe the decision applied to <br />island annexations. He added, however, that the issue had not been <br />tested in Oregon courts. He said the case of Thurber v. McMinnville was <br />more than 60 years old, and dicta in the case suggesting a possible right <br />to vote on all annexations had been repudiated by subsequent Court of <br />Appeals decisions. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie asked whether a phase-in of a tax differential had been <br />considered. Planning Director Susan Brody said the Planning Commission <br />had felt the council should consider those possibilities. She said the <br />City Finance Division had indicated no major problem with a tax <br />differential. She said a tax differential could establish a precedent <br />for other unincorporated areas and would remove the distinction of <br />special incentives for the River Road/Santa Clara area, but staff had no <br />major objection. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie asked whether the island was a justification for a tax <br />differential. Ms. Brody said that was possible, adding that a schedule <br />was available for a five-year differential beginning at 65 percent and <br />gradually increasing to 100 percent. She said a ten-year plan was <br />offered for industrial properties in the Highway 99 area, and a five- or <br />six-year plan was available to residential properties in River Road and <br />Santa Clara. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller asked about <br />urban growth boundary. <br />limits, about 1/4 mile <br />urban growth boundary. <br /> <br />the location of the current city limits and the <br />Mr. Bjorklund pointed out the current city <br />to the west and south of the property, near the <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 11, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />