My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/01/1988 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1988
>
02/01/1988 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 3:43:16 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:27:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/1/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />C. Notebook Material <br /> <br />1. Service Impact Statements <br /> <br />Mr. Wong reviewed information in notebooks. He said that because of <br />further analysis and adjustments for department overhead, service impact <br />statements included, on the second page, all programs of the ballot <br />results. <br /> <br />2. Revenue Statements <br /> <br />Mr. Wong said revenue impact statements had been prepared for four <br />preferred sources--a utility tax, a restaurant tax, a real estate <br />transfer tax, and a service fee, which was analogous to a business and <br />occupation tax but could apply to targeted segments. <br /> <br />a. Real Estate Transfer Tax <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Wong said the real estate transfer tax was being considered by Lane <br />County. He said staff recommended that, because of extreme fluctuation <br />in revenue, if this source was used, only a base amount be put into <br />operations, and any balance be put into services that could be cut <br />quickly or into the capital budget. He added that the County would <br />administer the tax for the City and was considering a tax of .2 percent. <br />Responding to Mr. Holmer's question, Mr. Wong said he was not aware that <br />the County was considering any type of moratorium on property sales <br />occurring within two or three years of a previous sale. <br /> <br />b. Service Fee <br /> <br />Mr. Wong reviewed the service fee. He said the City would attempt to <br />identify a service or a business activity for which the City provides <br />services and would charge an assessment for that. He said fees might be <br />charged, for example, for maintenance of the downtown mall, or a tax on <br />establishments serving alcohol might be used to fund law enforcement or <br />social services. Mr. Wong added that Eugene was one of only a few cities <br />that had neither a business and occupation tax nor a business <br />registration program. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan asked how Eugene compared to other cities in terms of total <br />City tax burden. Mr. Wong said staff would research that and should have <br />a response in two or three weeks. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman asked how a service fee would be collected. Mr. Wong said <br />there would be administration costs because the City would have to <br />establish a business registration or collection program. He added that <br />the size and cost of the program would depend on the type of fee. He <br />said a tax on serving alcoholic beverages would not be difficult, a <br />restaurant tax was estimated to cost about $150,000 to set up, and a <br />general business and occupation tax would be more complex. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 1, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.