Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />c. Department of Public Safety <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten noted that the Budget Committee had addressed the Juvenile <br />Unit, or the Cops-In-Schools Program. Mr. Miller raised the issue of <br />Community Affairs. Ms. Wooten requested more information about the <br />effectiveness of the Juvenile Unit, about use of guns, and about whether <br />civilians could be used at a lower cost, before revisiting the issue. <br />Ms. Ehrman said that issue was related to Community Schools. Ms. Wooten <br />said playing fields also were a related issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller expressed concern about impacts that affected part of the city <br />versus those that affected the entire city. He requested more <br />information about the impact of cuts to Community Affairs and the <br />Juvenile Unit on perceptions of crime. Mr. Gleason said he thought it <br />would provide the greatest benefit to the community, and Public Safety <br />staff would prefer, to concentrate scarce resources on prevention through <br />the Career Criminal Unit, the Juvenile Unit, and Community Affairs, <br />rather than on increasing direct response personnel. He added that he <br />believed the Juvenile Unit had been very successful in diminishing <br />problems. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom said the Budget Committee previously had received a report on <br />the Juvenile Unit. She also said the value of the water safety team had <br />been stressed at the recent Public Safety awards ceremony, and she <br />suggested that the Budget Committee receive information about the water <br />safety team. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller asked whether the full cost of the Juvenile Unit could be <br />shifted to the school district, adding that the program served only a <br />portion of the community. Mr. Gleason said he did not believe a shift in <br />costs was possible because of other program costs and lack of consensus <br />on the 4J school board. He added that the Juvenile Unit currently <br />operates at two schools, Churchill and South Eugene high schools. <br /> <br />d. Non-Departmental <br /> <br />Mr. Wong said the six-year financial forecast and council policy <br />predicted annual growth of $200,000 in Beginning Working Capital I and <br />that growth would be eliminated under the proposal, for a six-year impact <br />of $1,200,000. <br /> <br />e. Exclusions <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Wong said impact statements had been prepared for all of the programs <br />listed on the second page of the service rankings, but not all of those <br />services had been included in the proposed Strategic Financial Plan. The <br />services not included in the plan were described on the second page of <br />the memo from Mr. Wong, dated January 27, 1988, on the subject of the <br />Strategic Financial Plan, and included 1) the Hazardous Materials <br />Response Team; 2) Animal Control; 3) Wading Pools; 4) PSAP Equipment <br />Replacement Reserve; 5) Southern Willamette Research Corridor; and 6) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 1, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />