Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Gut.1I She said she thought it was worth trying an innovative approach <br />for a test year or for one summer. She added that she did not believe <br />the City had the luxury of continuing without a better solution. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer said he favored the ordinance because he thought it was the <br />responsibility of the City to protect individual liberty and property, <br />both of which were challenged by misuse of liThe Gut.1I He said that if <br />activity was corrected, designation of a congested area would not be <br />necessary, and he thought the ordinance was a reasonable effort to <br />address the problem and was the best plan being offered. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman thanked speakers for attending the hearing, which she said she <br />had found one of the more informative. She said she did not support the <br />ordinance, because she thought negative behavior by some, rather than <br />cruising itself, was the problem. She said she was sympathetic to <br />neighborhood concerns, but signs had been installed, and she favored <br />waiting until summer to see what happened. Ms. Ehrman said she disagreed <br />with the fines imposed by the ordinance, and she did not expect that <br />continued work on the ordinance would persuade her to support it. She <br />said she would like the youth commission and others to continue to work <br />on the problems, adding that while problems might be dispersed in the <br />short term, she thought they would boomerang in vandalism and other <br />impacts throughout the rest of the community. Ms. Ehrman added that she <br />believed costs of the ordinance would grow and selective enforcement <br />would occur because it would be impossible to enforce equally. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion carried 7:0. <br /> <br />Council Bill 3023 was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer moved, seconded by Ms. <br />approved and given final passage. <br />failed 2:5, Councilors Holmer and <br />Councilors Ehrman, Miller, Rutan, <br />nay. <br /> <br />Bascom, that the bill be <br />Roll call vote; the motion <br />Bascom voting aye; <br />Schue, and Wooten voting <br /> <br />Mayor Obie complimented speakers and said cruisers had won the vote <br />tonight, and they would win on South Willamette Street, by playing by the <br />rules. The meeting was recessed for a five-minute break at 9:20 p.m. <br /> <br />II. PUBLIC HEARING: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE EUGENE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the item. Diane Bishop of the <br />Public Works Department presented the staff report. She said the Eugene <br />Bikeways Master Plan had been adopted in 1975 and was reviewed annually <br />by the Bicycle Committee. She said the committee recommended no changes <br />to the plan but had received three requests from citizens. She said two <br />of the requests for funding priorities would be considered in future <br />Capital Improvements Program lists, and the third request, for a short <br />neighborhood connector, had been tabled by the Bicycle Committee. She <br />said connectors generally were not included on the master plan because of <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 22, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 14 <br />