Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />explore the possibility of setting up a system for each councilor. He <br />said he is not prepared to make a formal recommendation yet. <br /> <br />I. City Council Work Plan <br /> <br />1. Liquor Licenses <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman asked about the agenda item related to liquor license reviews. <br />Mr. Holmer said the ordinance is scheduled to come before the council <br />later in the spring quarter. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan recalled the council's interest in establishing City criteria <br />for the review of liquor licenses. He said the City does not presently <br />have criteria for reviewing those licenses. Mr. Holmer said the issue <br />was first raised by staff in October 1987 when staff wanted to be sure it <br />understood the council's present criteria for reviewing licenses. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan said he is unsure how useful it will be for the council to <br />discuss the issue because of the substantial amount of Federal and State <br />law already existing. Ms. Ehrman said she is also interested to know how <br />much time the council is scheduled to spend on the matter. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie asked how many councilors are interested in looking into the <br />issue. Mr. Holmer said Mayor Obie is acting without adequate <br />information. He said the issue is an effort from staff to draft an <br />ordinance stating what the current policies are. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason said he will put the issue on a future Wednesday agenda. <br /> <br />2. Building Code Enforcement <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten asked how Building Code enforcement was placed on the work <br />plan. Ms. Ehrman said she raised the issue because of constituent <br />concerns in her ward. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett said he is glvlng up on the issue of regulating minimal <br />standards for infill structures in a neighborhood. He said the problem <br />still exists, but he and staff have been unable to come up with a way to <br />address it. Ms. Schue said she is also unhappy about the issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason said there are two basic approaches one can take. The first <br />is the Housing Code, which directly addresses the concern but is an <br />expensive intervention. The second option is to augment the Nuisance <br />Abatement Program, which is less expensive but can be an inducement for <br />ensuring that minimal standards are met. He said all nuisance abatement <br />resources are presently focused on inspection. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett said he would like a report on the Building Code as it <br />applies to handicapped access for new construction, rehabilitations, and <br />historic building rehabilitations. He said the Commission on the Rights <br />of the Disabled is taking an aggressive position with regard to the code <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />March 7, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />