Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />ferred alternative J. Councilor Wooten said she would be willing to draft <br />any council recommendations if necessary. <br /> <br />Councilor Bennett said he appreciated the opportunity to read the minority <br />report as well as the majority report, and commended the minority report as <br />well-written. He referred to page 4, economic issues, of the minority re- <br />port, and said to his knowledge those facts are accurate. Councilor Bennett <br />said that in his conversations with people in the industry, automation will <br />not continue at the current level with less of a negative effect on employ- <br />ment. Additionally, the local area has not competed well with the southern <br />portion of the United States in terms of transportation costs and other <br />costs, and he understood this position may be improving. While lumber and <br />wood products manufacturing employment is slowly declining in importance and <br />diversification is occurring, it still playa major role in the local econo- <br />my, and it is necessary that it be maintained over as long a period of time <br />as possible. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilor Bennett asked Councilor Holmer or Councilor Rutan to address the <br />minority report position on scenic issues. Councilor Holmer said it is true <br />that there are more roadless acres, more scenery, and more old growth, but <br />there are fewer jobs. The majority concern was to weigh dispersed recreation <br />and developed recreation against the economic consideration. The majority <br />did not believe the forest service gave adequate attention to the economic <br />implications of the allowable cut. Councilor Bascom pointed out that this <br />did not answer the question. Councilor Wooten said in the context of CCED <br />discussions, the issue of scenic value was not brought up. She pointed out <br />that there would be no untouched scenic corridors or view sheds under alter- <br />native B, which she likened to the majority report; rather, 64 percent would <br />be heavily cut. <br /> <br />Councilor Bennett asked if there had been any technical response to the City <br />of Salem's position. Councilor Wooten said forest service staff did not <br />analyze that document. She reiterated that under the preferred alternative J <br />municipalities using the forest as a water shed will spend additional money <br />on water treatment due to additional sedimentation. Councilor Bennett asked <br />if the CCED discussions had been affected by the County.s position. Council- <br />or Rutan said the County's position came afterward. Councilor Wooten added <br />that the County position recommended that nothing in the Waldo Lake area be <br />touched at all. She said there is no way the local area can realize 700 <br />million board feet from the forest on a ten to 15 year basis without cutting <br />the Waldo Lake area, and said that the County's position was contradictory. <br /> <br />Councilor Bennett suggested using 650 million allowable board feet in the <br />recommendation to work with the County's position. <br /> <br />Councilor Bascom said she would like to send both the minority and majority <br />report to the forest service as the council will be split on this issue. She <br />said, on the basis of her reading of the reports, she said it would be fair <br />to put at the top of the list "timber supply;" however, she was unable to <br />support the allowable cut recommended by the majority. She felt it disre- <br />garded the critical issue of land resources and what the land is capable of <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 9, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 15 <br />