Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />David Fidanque, 1679 Willamette Street, represented the American Civil Liber- <br />ties Union. He said what the council has before it is a budget decision and <br />a question of priorities in terms of how the City will use its resources. He <br />said there is a strong criminal statute on the book prohibiting the sale of <br />drug paraphernalia and tobacco paraphernalia to minors. He asked why that <br />ordinance was not being enforced. He said the police department has been <br />required to make tough choices on how it will spend tax payers dollars in <br />enforcing the law. He said the problem is not a lack of laws; the problem is <br />how the City is going to attack the problem. Mr. Fidandque said the ordi- <br />nance before the council has flaws. He said regardless of whether the ACLU <br />gets involved in a court battle, there are other groups prepared to challenge <br />this ordinance on legal grounds. Mr. Fidanque said as a citizen of the city <br />of Eugene and a representative of the American Civil Liberties Union, he <br />hoped the council would make a decision directing the police to continue <br />doing a good job and not put another unenforced ordinance on the books, or <br />put one on the books that will result in a lengthy and expensive court battle <br />for the City. He urged the council to put this amount of money in the battle <br />against the real drug problem, methamphetamine manufacture and other serious <br />crimes in the city. Mr. Fidanque said that the Eugene School District has a <br />program about to be cut dealing with "students-at-risk." At the same time, <br />the council is contemplating the expenditure of money on this direction, <br />which Mr. Fidanque called a misdirection of scarce resources. <br /> <br />Mr. Fidanque urged the council to delete the section relating to hypodermic <br />needles if the ordinance is approved. <br /> <br />Bob Smalley, 303 Centre Court, said he is retailer and property owner in <br />Eugene and Portland. He product line includes t-shirts, posters, novelty <br />items, and smoking articles targeted for licensing in the ordinance. He said <br />he has been in business in Oregon for 16 years and entered the Eugene market <br />five years previous. He said a retailers reason for deciding whether to <br />enter a new market is based solely on an anticipated demand for the product <br />being sold. The success of a new retail venture is based on satisfying <br />existing customer retail demand. Mr. Smalley said he had invested $250,000 <br />in commercial buildings and a house in Eugene on West 7th Avenue. Mr. <br />Smalley said he has a substantial investment in the city of Eugene. He has <br />always complied with State law governing the sale of smoking articles to <br />minors and posts signs forbidding minors to enter or remain on the premises. <br />He said he favored the law passed by the Oregon legislature; it gave him the <br />ability to regulate the sale of smoking articles to minors and it works <br />because it is illegal for minors to use smoking devices for any purpose. Mr. <br />Smalley said he feels his store is being targeted and his customers discrimi- <br />nated against through this ordinance. State law has not determined that any <br />of his products are illegal to sell to adults. He failed to see why the City <br />of Eugene would want to enact a law targeting stores engaged in legal activi- <br />ty. He found the ordinance offensive in its obvious intentions of ridding <br />Eugene of targeted stores, and discriminating against his adult customers. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 9, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />