05/11/1988 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e difficult decision of taking the results of the election and adopting a final decision. Ms. Schue said Mr. Sercombe has been saying for some time that the State needed a good home rule case to decide some key unadjudicated issues. She asked Mr. Sercombe if he felt this was the type of case that could form the foundation for a landmark decision. Mr. Sercombe said yes, but admitted his optimism had been dimmed by the Court of Appeals' opinion. Outside the labor relations area, there has been no case before an Oregon appellate court involving a conflict between local and State law for more than two decades. There has been no case before an appellate court regarding ordinances relat- ing to self-governance since the LaGrande-Astoria case in 1978. Mr. Sercombe said many Oregon city attorneys had been waiting for an election case to argue home rule questions about the way local elections are structured and what people vote upon. He said the court reached its decision quickly and he felt that they mischaracterized the issue. He hoped to see further action on this case at the Supreme Court level. Mr. Miller asked what Mr. Sercombe estimated it would cost to carry the case to its ultimate end. Mr. Sercombe said the City has generally spent what it needs to in order to pursue the case. A brief was filed the previous Monday asking the Supreme Court to take the case. If the case is not mooted by the election on Tuesday and the Supreme Court takes the case, additional costs will include those incurred in responding to written questions from the court and orally arguing the case. Mr. Sercombe estimated these costs at an addi- tional $4,000 to $5,000. ~ Responding to a question from Ms. Bascom, Mr. Sercombe described two elec- tions held in the last 30 years presenting the voters with more than a single question. Mr. Rutan said he felt the descriptions in the Voters Pamphlet regarding the ballot questions were well-balanced and well-done. He said that he would like to get feedback from the public regarding the pamphlet. Mayor Obie agreed with Mr. Rutan's remarks, but expressed concern that the pamphlet had not been read. Mr. Rutan asked Ms. Bellamy to look into ways of getting public feedback and bring that information back to the council after the election. C. Wedding Anniversary Mr. Bennett announced that it was the occasion of his 14th wedding anniversa- ry and he would shortly be leaving the meeting. He said he had enjoyed the time he spent as a family person and wished to say he was proud of his fami- ly. D. First Christian Church Mr. Bennett brought up the issue of the First Christian Church discussed in an article in The Register-Guard by Don Bishoff. He asked if the staff in the Development Department could explore ideas regarding short-term solutions e MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 11, 1988 Page 3