Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />testimony, although the process does not give the council any chance to <br />deliberate on the significance of it. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman said the motion does not preclude a work session on at the <br />quarterly process session. Mr. Miller asked staff to bring a work plan for <br />the issue back to the council. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason said he understands the process to be that staff will review the <br />testimony and problems with the sign industry. It will return to the council <br />in one month with a set of recommendations. At that point, the council will <br />determine if it wants to explore the interim issue further or accept the <br />recommendations. <br /> <br />III. PUBLIC HEARING: VACATION OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED WEST OF GILHAM <br />ROAD, NORTH OF CRESCENT AVENUE (MARVIN KNUTSON) (SV 88-2) <br /> <br />City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the item. Jim Croteau, Planning <br />Department, presented the staff report. He said the area of the request has <br />received the consent of all abutting property owners. He said the portion of <br />the right-of-way on tax lot 1506 was approved for a Lakeridge Subdivision. <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau said staff is recommending the council vacate that portion of the <br />right-of-way that will be developed with the Lakeridge Subdivision. He said <br />the approved subdivision has a replacement street and right-of-way that will <br />connect up with the remaining unvacated right-of-way. He said property <br />owners will be provided with a similar, improved right-of-way in the new <br />subdivision that is approved to City standards. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Gerald Saunders, said he is the property owner to the west of the <br />subdivision. He said his mother granted him a 30-foot easement on the south <br />side of the field when he first built on the property 50 years ago. He said <br />he has been promised by the Planning Commission that he will have acceptable <br />access when the subdivision is built. He said the vacation should not be <br />approved until he has it in writing that he will have access. <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau said Mr. Saunders was provided with a copy of the proposed <br />Lakeridge Subdivision and has consented to the vacation. He said he told Mr. <br />Saunders that the right-of-way in the subdivision is exactly in alignment <br />with the current vacated right-of-way. He said the developer has also <br />petitioned to have the street approved. He said there are assurances in the <br />approved subdivision that the Saunders' property will be provided similar <br />right-of-way in the same alignment as currently exists. He said the new <br />right-of-way will be 50 feet instead of the pr~sent 60 feet, although it will <br />be an improved street with curbs, gutters, and paving. <br /> <br />After Mr. Croteau took several minutes to review the issue privately with Mr. <br />Saunders, Mr. Saunders said he is now clear about the proposed vacation and <br />does not have an objection to it. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 23, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />