Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Budget Committee is unclear and needs to be addressed. <br />e Mr. Bennett asked why time is being spent discussing line-item issues, <br /> instead of program cuts. Mayor Obie said line item cuts can solve part of <br /> the problems. Ms, Ehrman suggested that a combination of the two would be <br /> helpful. Mr. Holmer said savings on line-item cuts may save a program. He <br /> said line-items cannot be ignored as long as the focus is kept on policy. <br /> Ms. Bascom asked if it is appropriate to have the Mayor as part of the Budget <br /> Committee. Mr, Rutan said consideration of that would be part of the overall <br /> review of the Budget Committee process, but he feels the inclusion of the <br /> Mayor is legitimate. Mayor Obie said the Mayor may have a unique role of <br /> making recommendations to the Budget Committee. <br /> Mr, Bennett said he is not willing to be second guessed by the Budget <br /> Committee, although it is appropriate to have public input up front. Mr. <br /> Rutan said that when next year's budget is discussed, he wants to make sure <br /> the council is willing to take a strong stand and positive distinctive action <br /> to balance the budget. Ms. Wooten agreed the council must stand up to budget <br /> cuts but added that the problem is that councilors do not agree on what <br /> programs should be cut. <br /> Ms. Ehrman underscored the fact that the public must remember that the City <br /> system is based on a volunteer council and Mayor who have other commitments <br /> and who are not budget analysts. Ms. Bascom asked if the council has <br /> discredited the ASA approach. Mayor Obie said if Mr. Gleason wants to <br /> recommend using that approach, he can. <br />e Mayor Obie summarized the consensus views of the council today: 1) include <br /> council input on making a more elaborate list of priorities; 2) include the <br /> recommendations by the City Manager on program cuts; 3) deal with <br /> administrative financial policies; 4) include a refined ballot each year; 5) <br /> include potential phasing and restructuring of programs; and 6) include <br /> consideration of the Mayor's role in the budget process. <br /> Mayor Obie said that it seems that new revenue is not in the cards for the <br /> near future. He said he has received feedback from all sectors of the <br /> community who are not willing to consider new revenues. Mr. Holmer said <br /> there are some things that may warrant going to the people for specific <br /> requests for revenue, such as a new library, but not as a general source of <br /> new revenue. Mr. Rutan said he would not rule out new revenue opportunities <br /> such as the opportunity to expand the base of the gas tax or receive more <br /> road tax money, but he does not want to see increases in the cost of <br /> government. <br /> Ms. Schue advised councilors to read the list of capital projects the City is <br /> planning to do; she said many of them are not that urgent, Mr. Bennett said <br /> there is a procedure of prioritizing capital projects; he said they move up <br /> the list and are a long-term investment to the community. Ms. Wooten said <br /> the City cannot continue to defer capital projects if new revenues are not <br /> examined. Mayor Obie asked Mr. Wong for a list of the capital items not on <br /> that list. <br />e MINUTES--City Council Work Session June 13, 1988 Page 6 <br />