Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e Mr. Bennett noted that all who had testified regarding the ordinance had <br /> stated their support of historic preservation. <br /> Mr. Miller suggested that the council deal with the issues that have been <br /> identified in a systematic way during future work sessions and he requested <br /> specific examples of how the ordinance would apply to individual structures. <br /> Mr. Holmer said he was pleased that the ordinance was ready for council <br /> review. He asked staff to make the West University Neighborhood Cultural <br /> Resources Survey, August 1987, available to each councilor. <br /> Mayor Obie asked staff to propose an alternative to placing the burden of <br /> historic preservation on individual property owners. He indicated his strong <br /> support of historic preservation but said the community should share the <br /> burden of designation. <br /> Ms. Schue stated her concern about a property owner's potential inability to <br /> use property if it is designated. Mr. Bennett voiced a similar concern and <br /> added that the key to private participation and the long-term success of <br /> historic preservation is to encourage the economic success of the site or <br /> property. In his opinion, there is a greater burden on the owner of an <br /> historically designated property, but to the extent that it is one's choice <br /> to own the property, incentives, cost, and responsibility associated with it <br /> should be weighed by the owner before making that choice. <br /> Mayor Obie thanked those involved in developing the proposed ordinance. <br />e Ms. Wooten asked that the chair of the task force and the president of the <br /> Planning Commission be present for the council IS future discussions of the <br /> item. <br /> III. PUBLIC HEARING: REVISION TO SOLAR ACCESS REGULATIONS--INFILL WAIVER <br /> (CA 88-3) <br /> City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the item. Jim Croteau, Planning <br /> Department, gave the staff report. Mr. Croteau explained that the code <br /> amendment would revise the exemptions under the Solar Setback Standards to <br /> allow waiver for in-fill situations. The amendment would allow a waiver to <br /> the normal solar setback requirements for any new construction in the case <br /> where there is a vacant lot located between two developed lots that each have <br /> developed structures that are at least 20 feet in height and do not provide <br /> the amount of solar access protection required in new development. It would <br /> allow the house that is granted the waiver to be the average of the height of <br /> the two adjacent structures. <br /> The Planning Commission held a public hearing at which several people <br /> testified. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment. <br /> Notice of that hearing and the one this evening was provided to the original <br /> mailing list involved in the solar access amendments. Eugene Water & <br /> Electric Board submitted written testimony in support of the amendment. <br />e MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 12, 1988 Page 7 <br /> . <br />