Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e process and the 33 percent requirement would not obligate those unsure owners <br /> to make a decision at the outset. <br /> Ms. Wooten suggested a compromise that would allow initiation of the process <br /> with 33 percent of the property owners' support but would require 50 percent <br /> of the owners to support designation by a specified deadline in order to <br /> proceed. Ms. Brody described the proposal she had presented as a compromise <br /> that would be more likely to result in district designations than would Ms. <br /> Wooten1s suggestion. <br /> Mr. Holmer preferred requiring 50 percent support for initiation of district <br /> designations. Councilors agreed to consider Ms. Brody's proposal with the <br /> option of changing the requirement for initiation during later discussions. <br /> D. Composition and Role of Historic Review Board <br /> Ms. Brody reported that the Chamber of Commerce was concerned about the <br /> potential bias of the board in favor of historic preservation. The chamber's <br /> concern with balance was addressed by the addition of the conflicting use <br /> analysis discussed earlier, but Ms. Brody also suggested changing the <br /> composition of the board to achieve greater balance while providing a link <br /> 'with the Planning Commission by reducing to one the number of lay members and <br /> adding a member of the Planning Commission. An alternative would be to <br /> reduce to two the number of professionals and add a Planning Commissioner. <br /> Mr. Holmer anticipated achieving greater balance with the replacement of one <br />e of the professional members. Mr. Rutan concurred with Mr. Holmer's <br /> suggestion and indicated that the lay members would be more likely to have a <br /> broader approach while being less intense advocates. <br /> Ms. Brody pointed out that all boards are shaped by the values of their <br /> appointing bodies. <br /> There was consensus to accept the change suggested by Mr. Holmer. <br /> Ms. Brody concurred with the chamber's concern with the HRB1s ability to <br /> restrict use of a structure at the time of designation. This authority to <br /> make a land use decision exists in the current ordinance. Ms. Brody <br /> recommended that the ability to restrict uses be done through application of <br /> the H Historic District zone. This would allow expansion of uses allowed in <br /> the zone and would provide added incentive to the property owners by allowing <br /> more economically viable uses while protecting the property. <br /> Mr. Rutan supported the proposed change and considered it a positive step <br /> toward preserving certain landmarks. <br /> E. Scope of Ordinance <br /> Ms. Brody asked for council direction on whether to include provisions that <br /> increase the scope of the ordinance by adding interior features, allowing <br />- MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 26, 1988 Page 6 <br />