Laserfiche WebLink
the specific issue of police uniform standards, although there is existing city code that addresses <br />"criminal impersonation." The Police Commission believes that given the growth in the number and <br />types of security firms in operation in Eugene, an ordinance designed to address standards for police <br />uniforms would be a proactive measure. <br /> <br />Although the ordinance may only pertain to private security firms, and cannot be applied to the <br />Department of Public Safety at the University of Oregon, the Police Commission believes that such an <br />ordinance will have value in preventing uniform similarities from causing confusion to the general <br />public. Discussion will continue with the Department of Public Safety at the University of Oregon (UO- <br />DPS) regarding uniform similarities between UO-DPS and the Eugene Police. <br /> <br />The Police Commission recommends that, if enacted, the ordinance be complaint driven, e.g., there <br />would be no obligation by the City to review uniforms to ensure that they are distinguishable from those <br />worn by Eugene police officers. Consideration can be afforded to private companies that could be <br />affected by this ordinance by providing a reasonable amount of time for affected companies to come into <br />compliance with the ordinance. No financial or resource considerations are anticipated for the City of <br />Eugene. <br /> <br />Senate Bill 547-A, which was introduced by State Senator and Police Commissioner Floyd Prozanski, <br />and would amend ORS 162.367 to address criminal impersonation of a peace officer, is still under <br />consideration in the current session of the State Legislature. This bill states: <br /> "'Law enforcement uniform' means clothing bearing words such as 'police', 'sherifF, 'state <br /> trooper', or 'law enforcement', or clothing that is an official uniform or substantially similar to <br /> an official uniform of a law enforcement unit that would make it reasonably likely that a person <br /> would believe that the wearer is a peace officer." <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />During each legislative session the council takes a position on all bills identified as important to the City <br />of Eugene. On April 21, 2005, the council took the position of Priority 2/Support for SB547-A which <br />addresses, in part, issues around uniforms resembling law enforcement as to mislead the public. <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br />The council may choose to: <br /> 1. Take action on the proposed ordinance at the June 13, 2005, City Council meeting. <br />2. Direct staff to modify the proposed ordinance and bring the ordinance forward for action either at the <br /> June 13, 2005, meeting, or at a later date. <br />3. Take no further action on the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />On May 4, 2004, the Police Commission task group held a forum to convey its concerns about <br />police uniform similarities, explain its proposed solution, and solicit feedback on the concept. <br />Private security agencies, armored car services and campus security officials were invited to the <br />meeting. Feedback from attendees followed several common themes, including: <br /> <br /> - Non-sworn officers and security providers need to convey a professional appearance and <br /> establish a command presence to be effective, but there is no desire to emulate police. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050523\S0505233.doc <br /> <br /> <br />