Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e seeking input from the Library Board and the Friends of Our Library <br /> Committee; these groups will help process the issue. <br /> Ms. Schue said staff should not assume the Library Board members favor the <br /> project in this form; they feel there are many unanswered questions. She <br /> added that many members of the public do not favor this site for the library. <br /> Mr. Bennett asked about the possibility of holding an executive session to <br /> expedite the discussion of this issue. He said the council needs to spend <br /> time on the issue now, so the opportunity will not be lost. Mr. Gleason did <br /> not feel an executive session would be possible. <br /> Mr. Holmer said the library finance committee should be aware that there is <br /> not a $6 million limit on the tax increment bond. <br /> In response to a question from Ms. Wooten, Mr. Gleason said staff does not <br /> have a plan for processing this issue publicly. He said the difficulty of <br /> coming up with a plan is that no deal has been made yet. Critical to making <br /> the deal will be whether enough leases can be sold. Mr. Gleason said the <br /> cost of the project would be covered if Pankow developed an 18-story <br /> building. Pankow is only proposing 13 stories, however, and this affects the <br /> amount of increment available for financing the library. Mr. Gleason said <br /> another difficulty is that the longer deliberations hold up Pankow's <br /> development process, the more development will occur in suburban areas rather <br /> than downtown. <br />e Mr. Gleason said staff will probably look to the Council Committee on Library <br /> Financing to devise a public process and bring a recommendation to council. <br /> He suggested dividing the decision into two parts: deciding whether to buy a <br /> portion of the building, then deciding what to do with the space. Mr. <br /> Gleason said there are several options, including subleasing the shell to <br /> other developments or consolidating City office space at the site, until a <br /> decision on the library is possible. <br /> Ms. Wooten said the City must find a way to process this issue publicly <br /> because the public cannot be excluded from a decision this important. She <br /> added that it is imperative that council members and the public be kept <br /> informed about staff's ideas regarding this project. <br /> Mr. Gleason felt the Pankow deal must be closed within the next three months <br /> or the opportunity will be lost. He feels there will not be a better chance <br /> to fulfill the downtown objective of mixed-use and retail development while <br /> simultaneously completing the library. <br /> Ms. Wooten said she would like to have a process recommendation from the <br /> library finance committee. She felt the process will have to include the <br /> public in spite of the risks. Ms. Wooten asked staff to make it clear to <br /> Pankow that if the library is part of the development, the public will have <br /> to be given a chance to participate. <br />e MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 19, 1988 Page 6 <br />