My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/07/1988 Meeting (2)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1988
>
11/07/1988 Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 10:25:26 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:30:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/7/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> e Mr. Jacobson reported that the Downtown Commission had reviewed the request <br /> and recommended the council's approval. One letter was received from <br /> Benjamin Franklin Savings and Loan. No objections were expressed as long as <br /> an easement is reserved for public access. <br /> Responding to Ms. Ehrman's inquiry, Mr. Jacobson said the vacation would be <br /> permanent, but an easement would be reserved. The alley would continue to <br /> function as an alley, but a building would occupy the space over the alley. <br /> Answering questions from Mr. Bennett about why a vacation would be preferable <br /> to granting a permanent easement, Mr. Sercombe explained that when the City <br /> owns the alley, it also owns the air space above the alley. The vacation <br /> process allows public comment and participation and also gives the property <br /> owner some share in the responsibility for maintenance. Mr. Sercombe <br /> explained that there is no procedure for vacating a partial interest in a <br /> street or alley right-of-way. A procedure does exist for vacating all of the <br /> City's interests while retaining an easement. Mr. Sercombe continued by <br /> noting the unpopularity of a revocable permit procedure among property <br /> owners. Objections to the revocable permit option resulted in using the <br /> vacating procedure in a project at Sacred Heart Hospital. <br /> Mr. Jacobson agreed with Mr. Rutan that the vacation process would be more <br /> expensive for the applicant than would the revocable permit process. He said <br /> the applicant would be responsible for the vacation fee as well as an <br /> assessment for the alley, while the revocable permit process has no fee. <br /> e Mayor Obie opened the public hearing. <br /> Jim Saul, 111 West 7th Avenue, spoke on behalf of Selco Credit Union. Mr. <br /> Saul introduced members of the Selco board and its chief executive officer. <br /> Mr. Saul explained that Selco was seeking vacation because the City has no <br /> present mechanism for granting air rights above a street or alley. He said <br /> the revocable permit process could not be extended to incorporate the <br /> proposed development and allow vehicular traffic in the area. Mr. Saul noted <br /> that the proposed expansion is critical to Selco's business and he urged <br /> council approval. <br /> Gerald J. Resheske, 2730 Chad Drive, spoke as the branch manager of the <br /> Benjamin Franklin Savings and Loan. He read a letter from the Benjamin <br /> Franklin to Jerry Jacobson that acknowledged receipt of the notice of <br /> proposed vacation. The letter indicated no objection to the alley vacation <br /> so long as there is reserved for the general public an easement for ingress <br /> and egress and the use of the alley by Benjamin Frankline customers is <br /> uninterrupted. Restriction of vehicle traffic in the alley would impose a <br /> hardship on the Benjamin Franklin. Mr. Resheske asked that the letter be <br /> entered as part of the public record. <br /> There being no more requests to testify, Mayor Obie closed the public <br /> hearing. <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 7, 1988 Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.