Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e to future development of the project. Ms. Wooten said she is not suggesting <br /> that the council discontinue support for the project, but that the withdrawal <br /> of the developer provides a good opportunity to explore how to proceed with <br /> the project and whether it is a wise use of the City's resources. <br /> Mr. Bennett said he does not mind reviewing the City's total investment to <br /> date, but feels infrastructure development should proceed with or without a <br /> developer. <br /> III. WORK SESSION: LIBRARY FINANCING PROPOSAL <br /> (Pat Decker, Planning Department, gave the staff report) She said a number of <br /> questions were raised at the November 22, meeting of the Council Committee on <br /> Library Financing (CCLF). Committee members decided to get input from the <br /> balance of the council at this meeting.( Ms. Decker said the major questions <br /> raised at the last CCLF meeting were whether the council wished to finish <br /> 100,000 square feet of the library or only 75,000 square feet, and the <br /> relationship of library financing to funding in the current operating and <br /> capital budgets.) <br /> Mr. Gleason reminded councilors that the capital budget for the current <br /> fiscal year was cut approximately $850,000 from the original forecast. The <br /> six year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) currently being proposed is $2 <br /> million for FY90, $2.3 million for FY91, and $2.4 million FY92. Mr. Whitlow <br /> distributed a list of projects proposed in the $2 million budget forecast for <br /> e FY90. Mr. Gleason reminded councilors of the difficulty they faced in <br /> reducing spending by $850,000 last year to balance the budget. <br /> Mr. Gleason said the most recent six-year General Fund forecast projects a $1 <br /> million shortfall per year. This does not take into account changes that <br /> have occurred since the forecast was made, including $200,000 for the failed <br /> library levy, $400,000 in wages, $150,000 in urban wetlands issues, and <br /> $50,000 in emergency housing. <br /> Mr. Gleason said the possibility of cutting between $200,000 and $400,000 <br /> from the operating side of the budget has been discussed. He said that such <br /> a reduction would be possible but extremely difficult. <br /> ~ayor Obie said this issue is before the council because Councilor Rutan <br /> proposed that funds be taken from both capital and operating sides of the <br /> existing General Fund to finance the library.; Mayor Obie said the committee <br /> felt this would be a very difficult solution to funding the library because <br /> it would require a complete shift in priorities. The committee did not feel <br /> comfortable speaking for the council, however, so is now asking for council <br /> input. <br /> Mr. Miller said one funding option under consideration is the use of tax <br /> increment money generated by the building itself to help develop the library <br /> shell, and to use other tax increment money to help finish the library. He <br /> said if the library can be constructed using solely tax increment funds, <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 30, 1988 Page 8 <br />