Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e in the next seven years, it appears that even under the worst scenario, a <br /> line of credit would be obtained from a bank to be used to lend to Pankow for <br /> the construction financing. Because repayment is only at three percent and <br /> the City may have to borrow at eight to ten percent, there will be an <br /> interest subsidization. The City would take money out of the Bancroft funds <br /> to subsidize that interest; however, the agreement is that the Bancroft funds <br /> will 'be repaid based on certain things happening with the project. If the <br /> land is sold, the Bancroft funds are repaid immediately. Proceeds from the <br /> sale of the existing library site would be pledged to repaying the Bancroft <br /> funds. <br /> Mr. Wooten said she did not necessarily doubt that the Bancroft funds would <br /> be made whole over time, nor did she necessarily object to Mr. Wong managing <br /> what she called a "financial shell game," but she wondered how much the five <br /> to six percent difference in interest would amount to. Mr. Wong said it was <br /> approximately $1 million. Mr. Gleason said it could be as much as $1 <br /> million, but it is impossible to tell at this point because it is unknown how <br /> fast the line of credit will be borrowed down. There will be some cost to <br /> the Bancroft fund initially, but Mr. Gleason felt it is clear that the land <br /> transaction (which will be put back into the Bancroft fund) will yield more <br /> than any of the worst case scenarios in terms of repaying the Bancroft <br /> account, regardless of how long it takes to make that repayment. The <br /> Bancroft account has enough surplus so it is not being placed in any risk. <br /> Mr. Gleason said the real question for the council is whether it minds using <br /> money with a return of at least eight percent at some time in the future, <br /> without any risk, on the transaction of land. Mr. Gleason agreed with Ms. <br />e Wooten1s assessment that there would be a IIshort-term hole" of approximately <br /> $1 million. He disagreed that the long-term replacement could take as long <br /> as 30 years or as little as ten years, and said we could have the land money <br /> immediately. Mr. Farkas said profits from refinancing could be available in <br /> five years for repayment and Mr. Gleason said property tax from the project <br /> could start repaying the fund immediately. He said all the reports and <br /> analyses that were done had used the $13 million figure, but none of them <br /> included short-term financing (the cost of borrowing the money and building <br /> the project before taking out long-term financing). He said those reports <br /> were unrealistic in not considering the interim need for financing to allow <br /> the builder to pay contractors and employees. On the open market, Mr. <br /> Gleason said that interim cost would amount to approximately $2.25 million. <br /> He added that this need for short-term financing would exist with or without <br /> this project if the library were to be built on any site. <br /> Ms. Wooten noted that councilors have an obligation to ask the most difficult <br /> questions possible in order to obtain all the information about the project <br /> for public review. <br /> Mayor Obie asked if there was any guarantee that the project would happen <br /> once the community takes a "leap of faithll and moves ahead with an agreement <br /> with the developer. <br /> Mr. Gleason pointed out that builders do not build on their own cash but deal <br /> with banks. Bank loans are not available until leases are finalized and <br />e MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 14, 1988 Page 8 <br /> . <br />