01/23/1989 Meeting (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e e e Ms. Bishow continued by saying the Planning Commission requested staff to provide information during the next CIP process to help facilitate the commission's evaluation of the draft CIP for consistency with adopted City goals and policies. Mayor Miller opened the public hearing. There being no_requests to speak, Mayor Miller closed the public hearing. Ms. Bascom moved, seconded by Mr. Rutan, to adopt the draft Capital Improvement Program for 1989-90 through 1994-95, including the changes recommended by the Planning Commission and Budget Committee as noted in the errata sheet. Mr. Holmer noted that while he would vote in favor of the motion, he suggested seeking a more efficient way of addressing the CIP. In his opinion, because the council would consider the CIP as part of the budget process, the council's approval at this time appeared to have little meaning. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 6:0. IV. PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION/REZONING REQUEST FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED ON KNOOP LANE BETWEEN WALNUT AVENUE AND RIVER ROAD (HALL/MOORE AZ 88-3) City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. Cathy Czerniak, Planning, Development, and Building Department, reviewed the criteria for annexation and rezoning found in Section 9.158 of the Eugene Code. The property must be within the urban growth boundary and the annexation must be consistent with adopted plans and policies. Public service system facilities must be available and the annexation must result in a boundary within which services can be provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner. The uses and density that will be allowed must be able to be provided with services and the zone change must be consistent with the principals of compact and sequential growth. The proposed change must be consistent with the Metropolitan Plan and with applicable adopted neighborhood refinement plans. Ms. Czerniak noted that a letter which had been received after preparation of the council's materials was from the same person who submitted a letter to the Planning Commission that was included in the packet. That property owner was not included in the annexation proposal being considered. Ms. Czerniak explained that the annexation includes eight tax lots and portions of Mayfair Street and Knoop Lane rights-of-way. Five of the lots are currently developed with single-family residential units and three with duplexes. The proposal includes only consenting property-owners. Nonconsenting property owners were not included in this proposal for several reasons: 1) Nonconsenting properties are not essential in providing services to the eight properties; 2) The City is currently in the process of reviewing the annexation program; and 3) Inclusion of nonconsenting properties could further delay connection to the sewer system for properties currently experiencing septic system problems. MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 23, 1989 Page 3