Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />has performed well over the past 20 years. She pointed out that Eugene is <br />one of few cities with a licensing system for solid waste collection instead <br />of it being a franchised, contracted, or municipal service. <br /> <br />Ms. Utecht explained that the current system does not limit the number of <br />licenses, with the result that the industry needs more enforcement because <br />more haulers are competing for a fairly stable customer base. That decreases <br />each collector's efficiency and results in higher rates. Multiple licenses <br />allow a higher number of collection vehicles with increased wear on the <br />City's streets. The proposed ordinance would limit the number of licenses to <br />the number presently licensed and would eventually result in a reduction of <br />the number of licenses to the point that it may be feasible to assign areas <br />in a fair and equitable way. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bascom, Ms. Utecht said a comparison of <br />rates indicates that when collection systems are more consolidated, <br />efficiency increases and collection rates go down. Replying to Mr. Boles's <br />inquiry about provisions for haulers to trade customers, Ms. Utecht explained <br />that certain technology is available to different haulers. <br /> <br />Ms. Utecht anticipated 18 to 20 applicants for the proposed 20 available <br />licenses and said additional licenses would be granted only with a show of <br />need. She said she was unaware of any unserved areas in the city now. Ms. <br />Utecht added that additional licenses could be approved, if there was an <br />increase in the city's population, boundary changes, or another justifiable <br />increase in the customer base. Denial of a license could be appealed to the <br />~ Hearings Official. <br /> <br />Referring to a letter from Lane Garbage Apex Disposal, <br />the difference between rates in Eugene and River Road. <br />that the River Road area would not be regulated by the <br />said representatives of Lane Garbage Apex Disposal are <br />County staff on this issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer asked about <br />Ms. Utecht explained <br />City's ordinance. She <br />working with Lane <br /> <br />Ms. Utecht explained that the ordinance proposes adding a maximum to the <br />present minimum rate structure. In response to a suggestion by Mr. Boles, <br />Ms. Utecht said the Refuse and Recycling Board would be considering recycling <br />as part of the rate structure. She commented that landfills and disposal <br />costs are the responsibility of the County and the City's rate-setting is <br />limited to collection costs. <br /> <br />Ms. Utecht introduced Wally Swanson, Refuse and Recycling Board chair, who <br />reported on the history of the board since its establishment by City Charter <br />in the 1930s. He described the proposed ordinance as the product of efforts <br />by the board, industry, and City staff and said it would provide needed <br />stability and an opportunity for recycling. <br /> <br />Ms. Utecht introduced John Hire, representing the Associated Eugene Area <br />Recycling and Solid Waste Haulers. Mr. Hire said the industry is affected by <br />pressure to recycle, new technology, and safety and health issues. He <br />supported adoption of the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 8, 1989 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />