Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Hibschman reviewed the options council has with regard to update of the <br />renewal plan. These include: create a new renewal district to include all <br />the property north of 6th Avenue and expand the renewal district to only <br />include the property south of 6th Avenue; create a new renewal district; <br />expand the district, staying within the 20 percent limit; create an <br />assessment district to address parking and other needs in the area; not <br />expand at this time. <br /> <br />Mayor Miller asked whether the City could achieve the type of development it <br />desires in the downtown core without the urban renewal district. Mr, <br />Gleason shared examples from cities which do and do not have urban renewal <br />districts, He said cities without such a district still get private <br />development, but they do not get the type of development which makes a city <br />"user friendly" (e,g" park blocks, parking programs, light rail systems), <br />The only way to induce this extra public development in the absence of a <br />renewal district is to rely on property taxes. Mr. Farkas added that cities <br />without renewal districts are often characterized by urban sprawl as well. <br /> <br />Mr. Hibschman said the City presently has approximately $4 million in renewal <br />resources, Of this total, $1.5 million will probably be committed to the <br />development at 8th Avenue and Willamette Street, and $1 million will be <br />committed to the development at 11th Avenue and Willamette Street. Both <br />development sites will require site improvements, which combined are expected <br />to total approximately $,7 million. Mr. Hibschman noted that changes to <br />Olive Street have not been included in the estimate for site expenditures. <br />Finally, $.8 million may be committed to the rehabilitation of existing <br />buildings in the downtown core and/or used as leverage for development on the <br />remaining sites owned by the ERA, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Hibschman said once the projects at 8th Avenue and Willamette Street and <br />11th Avenue and Willamette Street are operating (in two to three years), the <br />City will be in the $7 million to $8 million bonding capacity range. At that <br />time, the City will be in a much stronger position to undertake some public <br />projects, <br /> <br />Mr. Farkas said the City is working with the County to try to secure County <br />road funds for the redesign of Olive Street, He said in order to secure the <br />monies, the City would have to demonstrate that the street improvements would <br />help create jobs; this criterion is met by the Pankow development which is <br />expected to generate between 150 to 200 new jobs over time. In addition, the <br />City must demonstrate that it does not have other available resources to use <br />for the redesign. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett emphasized that a number of businesses on the mall that front on <br />Willamette Street are moving and buildings are empty, He stressed that when <br />the City is deciding how to allocate its remaining resources, these <br />conditions should be considered along with all the other issues. Mr. Bennett <br />added that the proposed Pankow and St, Laurent developments will not help <br />revitalize the core area of the mall surrounding the fountain. He felt <br />reopening Willamette Street would help this area and that the community may <br />be willing to reconsider access when the situation on the mall gets worse. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 12, 1989 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />~ <br />