Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Don Duwe, 265 Taylor, spoke as the owner of a business whose only access is <br />from 5th Avenue. Mr. Duwe argued that it is unreasonable to purchase a home <br />in a busy area and then attempt to change a busy street to a residential one. <br />He maintained that traffic on 5th Avenue had been reduced as a result of the <br />completion of improvements to 6th and 7th avenues. He encouraged the council <br />to invest in an improved Council Chamber sound system instead of a permanent <br />diverter. <br /> <br />Jack Conklin, 2167 North Danebo, encouraged councilors to drive west on 5th <br />Avenue from High Street. He considered the diverter a deterrent to customers <br />of Eugene Mirror and Glass and Central Lane Builders Supply and he opposed <br />its being established permanently. <br /> <br />Lauren Heitzman, 2151 Golden Garden, identified himself as owning a business <br />located two blocks away from the diverter and said that he had not received <br />notice of the meeting nor had he been contacted by the Transportation <br />Division in an attempt to determine the effect of the diverter on the area <br />prior to a recommendation being made. He requested that consideration be <br />given to the fact that 5th Avenue is a public street, not a private one. <br /> <br />William Stril1zuk, 1410 West 5th Avenue, has resided in the area 48 years and <br />while he admitted that the diverter is inconvenient, he thought its <br />improvement of the residential area was worth the inconvenience. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Bill Snead, 2251 North 11th Street, Springfield, spoke as a Central Lane <br />Building Supply employee who finds the diverter an impediment to business. <br />Referring to a petition mentioned in earlier testimony, he said the 470 <br />signatures were not solicited but were gathered by leaving the petition on a <br />counter for customers to sign if they wished. Mr. Snead considered the <br />diverter a hardship for businesses at the east end of 5th Avenue as well as <br />for those closer to the diverter. <br /> <br />Cheryle Hawkins, 1350 Bailey Avenue, expressed the support of the Whiteaker <br />Community Council for establishing a permanent diverter. Ms. Hawkins <br />suggested that affected businesses offer maps to their customers showing the <br />alternative routes to their locations. <br /> <br />Celeste Rauschert, 1473 West 4th Avenue, maintained that the diverter results <br />in increased traffic on 4th Avenue. She suggested installing a half-diverter <br />across Almaden that would allow 4th Avenue residents easier access to their <br />homes. <br /> <br />Margaret Backenheimer, 1424 West 5th Avenue, reported that traffic, trash, <br />and damage to vehicles and shrubs have decreased significantly since the <br />installation of the diverter and she considered the widened 6th and 7th <br />avenues and the completion of the Chambers Connector adequate provision of <br />access to businesses in the area. <br /> <br />Ronald Wold, 1409 West 5th Avenue, said that without the diverter, he would <br />expect the increase in traffic on 5th Avenue resulting from the Chambers <br />Connector to make the neighborhood unlivable. He encouraged businesses which <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 22, 1989 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />