Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e city's industrial land supply at the level provided by the Metro Plan. Mr. <br /> Holmer read a memorandum supporting the need to adjust the inventory of land <br /> now available for industrial use in response to the wetlands designation's <br /> removal of over 700 acres of demonstrably needed inventory. <br /> Mr. Holmer supported the third alternative outlined by Ms. Decker and urged <br /> the council to direct staff to pursue that option in recognition of the <br /> urgency of the need for an interim amendment to the Metro Plan that will <br /> address the loss of marketable industrial land while long-range studies are <br /> being complet~d. <br /> Ms. Schue pointed out that the MPC has acted to accept the staff <br /> recommendation and has chided the City for not responding to the issue <br /> earlier. She said the update of the Metro Plan was cancelled because metro <br /> partners did not all agree to make the financial commitment required for that <br /> work. She added that there was no indication that the other two <br /> jurisdictions are willing to commit additional financial resources to this <br /> issue. While Ms. Schue appreciated Mr. Holmer's preference for quicker <br /> action, she was unsure that committing additional staff resources would be <br /> effective. <br /> Mr. Rutan concurred with Mr. Holmer's comments and added that the Metro Plan <br /> assures the availability of ready-to-develop land. He stressed that if land <br /> is not appropriately zoned, serviced, and ready for industrial development, <br /> that development will not occur. Mr. Rutan commented that the council's role <br /> should be that of pro-active decision-maker. Regarding the issue of timing, <br />e he proposed proceeding with a "floating proposal" (stating the need to expand <br /> the urban growth boundary by 200-300 acres of additional, developable, <br /> industrial-zoned land), subject to regular review and revision, and <br /> paralleling the wetlands study. He noted this would be similar to the <br /> approach used with the airport project where the City proceeded with design <br /> work and committing funds to that effort before we had a final vote. Without <br /> having all the facts, we could still move ahead. Mr. Rutan concluded by <br /> saying the Council Committee on Economic Diversification should have <br /> discussed the matter before it was presented to the council. <br /> Responding to an inquiry from Ms. Bascom, Ms. Decker said that 465 acres of <br /> industrial land are potentially impacted by wetlands. Mr. Holmer agreed with <br /> Mr. Rutan that a "floating" number should be used because the actual number <br /> of acres could vary depending on the results of the wetlands study. <br /> Councilors asked Steve Gordon, Lane Council of Governments, for further <br /> clarification. He said there are 465 acres of potentially regulated wetlands <br /> on land designated industrial by the Metropolitan Plan. In some cases, that <br /> includes acreage encompassing whole tax lots and in other cases it is acreage <br /> consuming only a portion of a tax lot. There may be an impact beyond that <br /> 465 acres on the usability of additional sites, due to location or size of <br /> that acreage on the tax lot that may not be accessible or usable. <br /> Regarding amending the buildable land inventory, Mr. Gordon said he and Jim <br /> Carlson suggested that option, and he cited the South Hills as a parallel <br />e MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 28, 1989 Page 7 <br />