12/04/1988 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e Mabel Armstrong, 92985 Marcola Road, Marcola.. term ending 12/31/91 Don Corson, 2845 Central Boulevard............ term ending 12/31/91 Dan Giustina, 2510 Highland.. ...... .......... term ending 12/31/91 Gus Keller, 4431 Echo Hollow. ................ term ending 12/31/91 The Mayor made the following nominations for appointment to the Tree Commission: Greg Ahlijian, 42083 Deerhorn Rd., Springfield. term ending 12/31/90 Fran Breen, 1666 Ridgefield.. .. .............. term ending 12/31/91 Bill Friedkin, 2033 North Park Avenue.... ..... term ending 12/31/91 Dennis Lueck, 2470 Oak ...... ...... ...... .... term ending 12/31/92 Ronald Schmaedick, 1742 West 34th Place....... term ending 12/31/92 Mary Bentsen, 950 West 16th Avenue.... ........ term ending 12/31/92 Mayor Miller called councilors' attention to a letter from Dennis Solin at EWEB announcing the appointment of Mr. Lum to the Tree Commission. Ms. Schue understood that policy was to attempt to broaden the appointments to include all classes of the population. She expressed surprise that on the Loan Advisory Committee, two men represent minorities, people with disabilities, and female head-of-households. She hoped that in the future, the Women's Commission would help recruit more applicants for this particular group. e Mayor Miller emphasized the importance of ongoing recruitment to provide a qualified pool of applicants when openings occur. Ms. Ehrman thanked Mayor Miller for his consideration of councilors' requests regarding appointments. Ms. Bascom moved, seconded by Mr. Bennett, to approve the Mayor's nominations as listed. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 7:0. H. Approval of Findings, Recommendations, and Minutes of Hearings Official and Approval of Improvement Project (Traffic Signal--Coburg Road and Chad Drive) Referring to the City Engineer's Order initiating the improvement, Mr. Boles expressed a concern about the percentage of the costs to be borneby the developers. Mr. Lyle said the two property owners were expected to bear 97 percent of the cost of the traffic signal, currently estimated at $138,000, including a ten percent contingency reserve. Based on current negotiations, the two developers responsible for the need for the installation of the signal would only bear a maximum of 81 percent of the cost. Mr. Boles had strong feelings that more of the cost should be born by the developers, easing the burden on Eugene's taxpaying citizens and moving in the direction of recouping the costs of development. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 4, 1989 Page 14