My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/24/1989 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1989
>
07/24/1989 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2018 4:24:47 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:33:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/24/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Investment in existing infrastructure and creation of new <br />infrastructure to reduce operating costs, respond to council and <br />community goals, and to foster economic diversification are critical <br />to addressing the overall financial situation. <br />Mr. Wong said that in the FY90 budget, $800,000 of the General Capital <br />Projects Budget is not funded. The City Manager's proposal, as affirmed by <br />the Budget Committee and council, is to fund these capital projects by a <br />combination of service reductions/adjustments and user fees/minor revenue <br />sources. Thus, the work on the Development Service Financing Study is <br />critical to ultimate realization of the adopted FY90 budget. <br />Mr. Wong said development -related services include but are not limited to <br />land use and zoning, building permits and inspections, safety inspections, <br />business assistance and development, and economic diversification. He said <br />that this study will focus on development services supported by the General <br />Fund. <br />Mr. Wong reviewed a chart depicting the City's current resources and <br />requirements. The resources generated by user fees total $1.1 million. The <br />requirements total $5.6 million. This leaves $4.5 million worth of services <br />that are not currently funded by user fees. <br />Mr. Wong reviewed the methodology for the study. He said the technical <br />analysis will consist of: identifying all development -related services; <br />identifying the direct and indirect costs of providing each service; <br />• determining appropriate user fee support for development services; <br />identifying existing user fee support; determining if adjustments to the <br />existing user fees are feasible and develop recommendations for changes; if <br />not, identifying new user fees to meet the policy level established for user <br />fee support, and initiating a process to secure new or enhanced user fees. <br />Mr. Wong said the full council can be involved in this study, or the study <br />can be processed through a council committee. He said staff recommends that <br />the study be processed through the Council Committee on Economic <br />Diversification (CCED), with feedback to the full council. <br />Mr. Holmer asked how the levels of user and nonuser fees should be related. <br />Mr. Gleason said staff believes this is a policy decision that the council <br />must make. <br />Mr. Rutan said the goal of the Development Services Financing Study should <br />not be to rationalize a policy of 100 percent recovery of costs through user <br />fees. Rather, the study should give council the information it needs to set <br />policy regarding user fees. <br />Mr. Boles suggested that the study be processed through the Council Audit <br />Committee rather than CCED. He said CCED already has its own agenda and a <br />set framework through which it analyzes issues. He thought it would be best <br />to process the study through a committee with a broader perspective. Mr. <br />• MINUTES --City Council-- July 24, 1989 Page 2 <br />Dinner/Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.