Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e libraries a proposal to restore library services. Rural non-City Lane County <br /> residents have been without library service since the county library levy <br /> failed in June, 1988. <br /> The Board of County Commissioners appointed a countywide task force to <br /> investigate possible ways to restore library services to members of the <br /> county. The task force has drafted a proposal that will provide service to <br /> county residents by contracting with the cities that currently have existing <br /> libraries and library districts. Public library services would be provided <br /> to county users without imposing a fee. The County would not reestablish a <br /> library, but would simply administer the contracts. Rather than operate its <br /> own library, the County would provide access to existing sources. <br /> Reimbursement will be provided for permitting county residents to make use of <br /> the library resources. Calculation for reimbursement will be based on actual <br /> library use; the approximated reimbursement for the Eugene Public library is <br /> $165,000 the first year. Because this service will need to be funded by a <br /> serial levy, taxes collected in the cities and districts would be rebated to <br /> them, over and above the contract payment. Eugene would receive a rebate of <br /> about $400,000 a year. A three-year levy is assumed, with the contract <br /> amount to be adjusted each year to reflect actual usage. Ms. Hildebrand said <br /> that this proposal has been discussed and accepted by the staffs of these <br /> libraries and cities and by the Lane Council of Librarians. <br /> Mr. Holmer inquired about the way in which county participation in the <br /> e library will be measured. Ms. Hildebrand responded that the Council of <br /> Librarians has suggested that participation be calculated based on the number <br /> of items checked out by county residents. <br /> Ms. Ehrman asked whether the money obtained from the rebate would be <br /> dedicated back to the library budget. Ms. Hildebrand replied that the use of <br /> these funds in the future would be dictated by the council and budget <br /> committee. The practical value of this proposal to the Eugene voter would be <br /> evident in increased library service and enhanced resources. Ms. Hildebrand <br /> said that library hours would be extended to include Tuesday evenings in the <br /> summer and Wednesday evenings year-round. Additionally, the money obtained <br /> from this rebate would be informally dedicated toward the book and materials <br /> budget, thus increasing existing resources. <br /> Mr. Bennett asked why the serial levy is calculated so that the rebate is <br /> substantially higher than the cost. Mr. Kaplan, consultant on the issue, <br /> said that the amount of money needed to be collected in rural areas in order <br /> to provide service to rural residents and the tax rate to collect that amount <br /> are figured first. Because it is a countywide service, the tax rate must be <br /> collected on a countywide basis. Approximately $295,000 will be collected <br /> from the rural areas and allocated among the seven existing public libraries <br /> to pay for county service. Money will be collected at the same tax rate in <br /> all seven cities and districts that have existing library services. This <br /> money will be rebated to those districts, less a small amount for <br /> interlibrary projects. Mr. Bennett said that he supports the reimbursement <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 22, 1989 Page 7 <br />