Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e council and to direct that as implementation of policies <br /> proceeds, mid-point checks are to be provided in order to <br /> determine if new policies are needed. <br /> Mr. Boles said the Manager has a responsibility to inform the council about <br /> the potential consequences of policies as they are being crafted. <br /> Mr. Green said he felt that Mr. Gleason informs the council of the political <br /> implicatjons of policies. <br /> Mr. Holmer commented on the difficulty of the task being attempted by the <br /> council (evaluation of the Manager) and referred to a memorandum he had <br /> presented to councilors December 4. He asked whether the memo should be <br /> maintained as confidential at this time. <br /> Bill Gary, City Attorney's Office, said that the fact that the council was <br /> not in executive session eliminated one of the bases upon which that <br /> memorandum or any materials related to the session could be considered to be <br /> exempt from disclosure. ORS 192.502 Section (1) exempts from disclosure, <br /> conditionally, "Communications within a public body or between public bodies <br /> of an advisory nature to the extent that they cover other than purely factual <br /> materials and are preliminary to any final agency determination of policy or <br /> action." <br /> Mr. Gary said that councilors' notes and memoranda they may have exchanged in <br /> e preparation for the evaluation could be interpreted as preliminary to the <br /> final evaluation and so W9Ylg fit under that @~@mDtion_ ~owova~. tk6 <br /> :~~mB318n aDDll~~ OnlY If tno BU81~~ g~~y ~~~~ludes and S~?~i ihii ih~ <br /> lR(B~8!t "- ' - ~n Qncour~~in~ Trinh Gommunlcatlon b~tWQQn Offl~1~1~ ~~~ <br /> employes of public bodies clearly outw~ighs the public interest in <br /> disclosure." Given the fact that the process was taking place in a public <br /> meeting, it may be difficult to reach that conclusion. <br /> Mayor Miller noted the importance of identifying any single councilor's <br /> opinion as that individual's if it did not represent the majority opinion of <br /> the council. <br /> Councilors agreed with Mr. Holmer's request to release his memorandum to <br /> representatives of the media. Mr. Rutan said that during an evaluation, it <br /> is important to consider general performance and not to focus on single <br /> issues or circumstances. Ms. Bascom wished to avoid evaluating the Manager <br /> at the detailed level proposed by Mr. Holmer. She pointed out that in Mr. <br /> Holmer's memorandum, he erroneously attributed to staff proposals having to <br /> do with the Tree Commission and Cultural Affairs Commission for which Ms. <br /> Bascom had in fact been responsible. <br /> Mayor Miller described Mr. Holmer's memorandum as containing errors and <br /> omissions and said responsible reporting would make it incumbent on the media <br /> to verify the truth of Mr. Holmer's points. He suggested that Mr. Holmer's <br /> criticism may be directed more legitimately toward the council and its <br /> direction to staff than toward the Manager's performance. <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 6, 1989 Page 5 <br />