01/20/1982 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e will be put in jail. For one year at the current rate, it would cost $20,000 per person. Mr. Lindberg asked about Eugene Emergency Housing. Mr. McKinley stated that it is difficult to get the figures from the computer. There are no hard statistics. Mr. Gleason added that since the state has actively started moving people out of mental health facilities, there has been an increase in the number of people at police and information service counters. Mr. McKinley added that Family Shelter House put up 915 people in 1981, and turned away 415 people. Mr. Lindberg stated that from study groups and other meetings he had attended, he feels it would be foolish to put construction off. He feels there should be an analysis done to link this concern with other high-priority City projects. He does not feel there should be an immediate focus to turn the City's energies toward social services, but that there should be follow-up done. Ms. Schue indicated agreement with Mr. Lindberg. She would rather see the $20,000 spent on housing individuals in the jail spent on more useful housing needs. Mr. McKinley added that there are only four temporary shelters in Eugene. Ms. Wooten stated that she had hoped an item could be placed in the 1983-84 CIP, but for this year because of the need, they might want to look at the Civic Emergency Fund, which could be used until something could be done. e Ms. Smith stated that she would want a thorough analysis prior to any "band-aid" approach. These agencies are struggling to fill the needs in the community. The entire focus should be addressed as well as the role that city government should play. It should be determined whether this is a long-term City respon- sibility. Mr. Obie wondered, if the City pays for the jail services, who pays for those cases that originate from the County. Mr. Gleason responded that he, Chief Packard, George Morgan, and Sheriff Burks had met about this issue. There is now an itemized billing for jailing costs. This is no longer the problem that it was. The amount of funding from the State detox program has not yet been determined. Ms. Wooten stated that since the CIP has been circulated, she has been concerned about raising $47 million to pay for these improvements. She does not feel the City can go to property taxes for the entire package. She has tried to think of how to cut those items of least importance. A model should be developed of alter- natives with different levels of funding so it can be more easily determined what is affordable. She distributed copies of information she had presented to the Budget Committee. While only $47 million is projected for this year, it is the General Fund question that needs to be dealt with. Without General Fund moneys coming in, there will be $20 million going out. Alternative 1 on the information sheet distributed shows what it would be without this revenue. Alternative 3 on her information sheet shows the last link of the Eugene sewer trunk line. She feels this could be a good way to proceed. The council must look at ways beyond property taxes for funding mechanisms. She is hoping that housing will be discussed further at a later time. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 20, 1982 Page 6