Laserfiche WebLink
<br />To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land <br />resources of the state. <br /> <br />Goal 6 requires that air, land and water resources of the state be maintained and improved by <br />assuring that future development, in conjunction with existing development, does not violate <br />applicable state and federal environmental quality standards, and does not exceed the carrying <br />capacity of local airsheds, degrade land resources or threaten the availability of such resources. <br />The State of Oregon, City of Eugene, and Lane County have regulatory measures in place to <br />regulate existing land use activities, as well as future development on the site. <br /> <br />The Lane Regional Air Pollution Authority (LRAP A) regulates the Lane County airshed and the <br />industries within it. LRAP A rules and permit requirements regulate the release of particulate <br />matter into the air. Its permit system for emissions provides the regulatory measures that <br />maintain the carrying capacity and quality of the airshed consistent with applicable state and <br />federal environmental quality standards. An Air Contaminant Discharge Permit (ACDP) is <br />required for the aggregate processing equipment and mining activities on the subject property. <br />Delta Sand & Gravel currently operates its existing, adjacent facility under an ACDP issued by <br />LRAPA (Permit No. 20119) that permits and regulates dust emissions generated by (1) <br />processing equipment; (2) storage piles; (3) roadways; and (4) yard activities. In addition to the <br />specific standards for particulate matter emissions that apply to the process operations, the <br />ACDP includes a requirement to follow the LRAP A-approved Fugitive Dust Control Program <br />for the existing facility. If Delta Sand & Gravel were to expand its operations onto the proposed <br />expansion site, the applicants proposed to implement the Fugitive Dust Control Program on the <br />expansion area to assure that its operations continue to comply with applicable state and federal <br />air standards. There was substantial evidence in the record that indicated that the fine particulate <br />matter (dust) would not be mitigated to a level of insignificance because of the proximity of <br />homes and school site to the proposed expansion area. The applicants did not provide an <br />Economic, Social, Environmental and Energy (ESEE) analysis. The City of Eugene found that <br />the application could not be approved pursuant to Goal 5 and the rules that implement Goal 5 <br />(see Goal 5 findings for additional information). <br /> <br />We note that the applicant has testified that the processing facility (the rock crusher and <br />associated facilities) will remain at its current LRAP A-regulated location and will not produce <br />finished aggregate material in excess of its current LRAP A ACDP-mandated levels. The <br />location of the processing facility and its production level is regulated by the ACDP. The <br />applicant has testified that the location of that facility and its production levels will not change as <br />a result of approval of this application, yet, in answer to questions at a public hearing, the <br />applicants also indicated that the production was somewhat flexible and reacted to demand <br />(Exhibit 1). Further, the crushing facility is not the sole source of dust from the site. Significant <br />levels of dust result from on-site hauling. See Exhibit 218, attachment A. See also Exhibit 33b, <br />Concerned Santa Clara Citizens, including reports by Camille Marie Sears and Stephen <br />Kimberley, MD.; Exhibit 51, Lane Regional Air Pollution Agency; Exhibit 53, Dick Ruth; <br />Exhibit 61, peer review; Exhibit 63, Knepler; Exhibit 223, SAIF; Exhibit 224, Sarah <br />Hendrickson, MD; and Exhibit263 and 263a, S. Kimberley, MD. The City finds that the <br />evidence presented by the applicant was insufficient to overcome that presented by opponents. <br />Questions about LRAPA's ability to adequately regulate and the long term viability ofLRAPA <br />were raised during the joint elected officials' hearing, because there have been regular, long- <br />standing discussions about the agency's on-going existence (see Nepler, DuPriest, Bettman, and <br />Taylor testimonies at the 12/12/06 joint public hearing). In the case ofLRAPA's dissolution, the <br />Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) would be responsible for enforcing local <br />air quality standards. The Council finds that conditions of approval dependent on LRAP A's <br />enforcement are not satisfactory for long term mitigation of a potentially hazardous source of <br />dust proximate to an urban residential area. <br /> <br />Both of the Planning Commissions found unanimously that there is a conflict due to dust, and <br />that the conflict due to dust could not be minimized to a level that meets the DEQ emission <br /> <br />Exhibit A to Ordinance 20413 - 27 <br />