Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, ;; <br />\ . <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />the exception would swallow the rule. Mr. Andersen said that current code also <br />allows clinics as a conditional use in the R-2 zones and asked that the council <br />and Planning Commission address this issue as well. <br /> <br />Speaking with other comments: <br /> <br />LaVerne Edwards, 1260 President Street, said that she served on the Western <br />Oregon Health Systems Agency (WOHSA) advisory group but that she was not speaking <br />as a representative of that group. She suggested that City staff get in touch <br />with WOSHA staff who could provide information on the cost of clinics and <br />equipment and projections for demand and expansion needs of clinics. She felt <br />that the City may be overplanning for clinics and that many more clinics may <br />not be needed. <br /> <br />Bill Lioio, 2678 Sharon Way, asked the council to consider the impact of increas- <br />ingly restrictive zoning on the property rights of owners and the effect of such <br />zoning on reduction of demand for land in the West University area as a result <br />of eliminating the uses identified in the amendments. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Allen Johnson, 1991 Madison, represented a clinic located at 1461 Hilyard <br />Street. He asked that staff look into a "housekeeping" matter involving <br />conflicting information contained in two separate communications from the City, <br />regarding expansion of clinics in the R-3 and R-4 zones. He referred to a <br />letter dated January 29, 1982, from Jody Miller of the Planning Department, <br />which indicated that the six existing clinics in the West University area south <br />of 13th Avenue would be protected, and to the corrected hearing notice which <br />failed to give the same assurances as Ms. Miller's letter. He asked that the <br />information in the notices be corrected. Mr. Johnson said that the compromise <br />presented in the amendments represents a rational effort to deal with two valid <br />but competing needs and urged the council to adopt the amendments. <br /> <br />There being no further testimony, public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau said that existing clinics in the R-3 and R-4 zones had been surveyed <br />to determine what land they own that would fit under the definition of development <br />control. He distributed copies of a map showing the additional parcels that had <br />been identified. He said that staff would check the amended hearing notice to <br />see if there was an error. He offered to meet with Mr. Cox to discuss the <br />problems of the church wishing to locate in the West University neighborhood. <br />Mr. Croteau addressed the issue raised by Mr. Andersen and said that current <br />codes do not allow clinics or doctors 1 offices as outright or conditional uses in <br />the R-2 zone, but that hospitals are allowed in R-2. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindberg asked what definitions are currently used for clinics and group- <br />care homes, and how these would apply to the situation of Serenity Lane. Mr. <br />Croteau responded that Serenity Lane is located in the R-3 zone and would <br />therefore be allowed to expand as a hospital. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 8, 1982 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />