My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/08/1982 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1982
>
03/08/1982 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 4:11:03 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:36:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/8/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Regarding a definition for pay television, Mr. Martin said that it was the <br />commission's desire to expand its scope of coverage as much as possible. The <br />language, as proposed, would provide that any time a signal has been broadcast, <br />no matter where in the country, it could not be captured and transmitted by <br />satellite and treated as pay television in Eugene. If Teleprompter chooses, in <br />cooperation with the commission, to put a signal that is only a cablecast signal <br />into Section 5 (Programming), it loses its characteristic as pay television and <br />becomes subject to the commission. As long as a signal stays as a private <br />cablecast signal, not subject to the language of the franchise directly, it is <br />pay television and outside the scope of the existing franchise. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindberg asked for further clarification. Mr. Martin said there is a <br />Federal definition of pay television which has allowed the Federal government <br />to pre-empt the pay television area, except where local governments have agreed <br />with their franchise to the contrary. If a cablecast signal becomes part of the <br />package that sets the rate, then that signal is no longer subject to the Federal <br />rules and comes under the commission's jurisdiction. <br /> <br />Mr. Martin noted further changes in the ordinance on page 4 where it stated that <br />the cable company is required to give notice to the commission 60 days before <br />undertaking the installation of equipment to expand the system. This change was <br />the result of negotiations. Teleprompter's position was that the decision to <br />expand the system or not was a private business decision; the commission's <br />position was that expanding the system or increasing the assets so that it <br />became part of the rate base would allow rate increases the commission would be <br />unwilling to accept. The 60-day notice will permit the commission to tell <br />Teleprompter not to ask for an adjustment in the rate base because of improve- <br />ments. The commission would take the improvements into account when future rate <br />requests are considered. The notice will also provide time for public discus- <br />sion before any expansion is executed. The commission does not have the power <br />to veto that business decision, but it at least has the ability to place Tele- <br />prompter on notice if there are apprehensions about it. <br /> <br />Page 5 of the ordinance defines what constitutes the basic services and identifies <br />the new service to be provided no later than January 1, 1983. The commission <br />has agreed to the removal of the KVDO signal from the basic service which can be <br />removed by special permission of the FCC since it is a duplication of public <br />programming from KOAC in Corvallis. Further language in this section of the <br />ordinance deals with a multiplicity of duplicating programs on several channels. <br />It also allows Teleprompter to provide a network signal from some other affiliate <br />if the local affiliate's broadcast signal is interrupted. Mr. Martin said that <br />the ordinance also states that Teleprompter may operate its own signals over <br />KOZY after the public access center is operating. KOZY's programming is now <br />restrained, giving a priority and preference to local access programming and <br />requiring that certain other signals be carried on it. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue asked who would decide what would be programmed on the access channel. <br />Mr. Martin said it would be the decision of the Cable Commission and the operator <br />of the access center. Ms. Wooten asked if Teleprompter would provide the lines <br />for direct cablecast of such things as City Council meetings. Mr. Martin said <br />Teleprompter has agreed to do that. Providing direct cablecast from the Perform- <br />ing Arts Center poses a number of problems in terms of copyrights, performance <br />rights, etc., that have not been resolved by the Cable Commission. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council Work Session <br /> <br />March 8, 1982 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.