Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten thanked the volunteers who have worked on the issue of public <br />access broadcasting. She said that she had spent considerable time studying the <br />proposed changes to the franchise and had the following concerns: 1) she wanted <br />public access television to work and did not see how it could be a success on a <br />budget of $50,000; 2) she felt that using leased access and other revenue- <br />generating activities would be healthy for public access and would help public <br />access become self-supporting; and 3) she felt that the area of pay TV is <br />changing so rapidly that the commission needs to discuss when and how to request <br />the next franchise evaluation. <br /> <br />Councilor Haws said that he found the whole process extremely frustrating. He <br />asked staff to work on improving the process. He said that Teleprompter was a <br />poor utility and did not meet up to Eugene's standards or to the standards of <br />other utilities serving the city. He said that he would vote against the <br />proposed amendments as a protest against Teleprompter. He said that the citizens <br />of Eugene deserve the same level of cable service as other cities. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindberg said that providing good representation on the Cable Commission was <br />the responsibility of the council. He said that on a number of occasions <br />Mr. Hamel had asked councilors to give him direction and that councilors had not <br />done so. He suggested that a small subcommittee of the council be formed to <br />discuss the issues, formulate positions, and provide information for its <br />representative. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilor Obie expressed surprise at the charges that he had a conflict of <br />interest on this matter and noted that he is not involved in the television <br />business. He said that the $410,000 expenditure for public access came ultimately <br />from the rate payers, not from Teleprompter. He said the rate payers should be <br />polled to determine whether they wish to pay for public access. He said that <br />public access is available now on Eugene's commercial television statio~s and on <br />statewide publicly owned stations. Mr. Obie said that he would vote against the <br />franchise amendments, since cable subscribers have not been polled to determine <br />whether they are willing to pay for public access television. <br /> <br />Councilor Hamel said he had listened to the arguments of public access advocates <br />for fifteen months. He said that he had attended cable information meetings <br />sponsored by the National League of Cities. He said that there is no standard <br />of the art in the cable industry and that the Eugene-Springfield area must <br />create its own standard. He said that he had asked for input from councilors on <br />this issue but had not received it. He said that he would vote in favor of the <br />amendments. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller said that the council had not studied cable issues, but had instead <br />delegated cable-related decisions to the Cable Commission. He said the council <br />could therefore only blame itself if it was unhappy with the process that had <br />been used or the results of negotiations. He said it appeared that several <br />councilors favor the 1981-plus funding formula and suggested that discussion of <br />this matter be pursued through traditional budget channels and be considered by <br />the full Budget Committee. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />March 8, 1982 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br />