My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/24/1982 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1982
>
05/24/1982 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:17:40 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:37:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/24/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />this zone change was therefore a valid one. He noted that there are more than <br />2,000 homes on the market in Eugene at this time and over 4,200 buildable RA/R-l <br />lots are vacant and available. He quoted from the staff notes on this item, <br />which said that the necessity of showing public need on this matter was "minimal." <br />Mr. Saul said that the public need criterion had been very loosely applied to <br />the application in question. He felt that the City should not place any greater <br />burden of demonstrating public need on other applicants than it places on <br />itself. <br /> <br />There being no further testimony, public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau referred to the annexation of this property to the City. He said <br />that City Code requires that the appropriate City zoning be applied when land <br />is brought into the City. He said that in the case of this property, zoning <br />had already been applied by the County and that, therefore, the City replaced <br />the County designation with the corresponding City designation. Mr. Gleason <br />said that there was difficulty in administering the issue of public need. He <br />said that application of public need criteria at annexation and at the time of <br />rezoning were two different issues. <br /> <br />Councilor Miller felt that this land was irrevocably committed to urban develop- <br />ment, since it is almost completely surrounded by urban development. She said <br />that the school district has the capacity to accommodate development in this <br />area and that the area is not appropriate for continued agricultural use. She <br />questioned, given these factors, to what extent staff should be directed to go <br />through the exercise of writing standards and criteria to support the rezoning. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />CB 2474--An ordinance authorizing rezoning from County RA Suburban <br />Residential to City RA Suburban Residential for property <br />located south of Centennial Boulevard, between Alton <br />Baker Park and Chevy Chase Subdivision. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, that findings supporting <br />the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes <br />and minutes of April 6, 1982, be adopted by reference thereto; <br />that the bill be read the second time by council bill number <br />only, with unanimous consent of the council; and that enactment <br />be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Council Bill 2474 was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr.Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, that the bill be approved <br />and given final passage. Roll call vote. All councilors present <br />voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18972. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 24, 1982 <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.