Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Chester Pietka, 1251 Lincoln Street, referred to the experiences of the Data <br />General Company, which had considered locating in Eugene several years ago. He <br />said that the people of Eugene have worked too long for "things which don't <br />sustain jobs.1I He urged the council to adopt the ordinance creating the Downtown <br />Commission with the stipulation that the commission will be evaluated in three <br />years to see whether it is working effectively. <br /> <br />Laura Johnson, 1810 Fairmount Boulevard, said she supported all aspects of the <br />proposal before the council, with the exception of the language in the ordinance <br />which appeared to permit enlargement of the Eugene renewal area. She said that <br />the map accompanying this ordinance seemed to include the 5th Street Market area <br />within the renewal area. She said that if this is not the case and if the <br />ordinance provides no opportunity for enlarging the renewal area through tax <br />increment funds, then she would support the ordinance. <br /> <br />LaVerne Edwards, 1260 President Street, said that while she was in favor of <br />reducing the number of committees dealing with the downtown, she opposed any <br />enlargement of the renewal district. She referred to previous discussion of <br />creat ing a "doughnut" renewal area around the downtown and said it appeared to <br />her that the ordinance before the council would make the "doughnut district" a <br />part of the renewal area. Ms. Edwards said she opposed such action. She also <br />felt that there had been insufficient opportunity for public involvement in the <br />proposal before the council. She objected to granting public financing to a <br />special class of people with no representation or opportunity for public testimony <br />from neighbors or citizens from outside the downtown area. She said that she <br />would support the ordinance if it does not allow any land to be removed from the <br />tax rolls. She noted that new businesses locating in the downtown area are <br />deliberately choosing to locate outside the renewal district. <br /> <br />H. Thomas Andersen, 790 West Broadway, represented the West University Neighbor- <br />hood Quality Project (WNQP), of which he is chairperson. He said that group was <br />mainly concerned with the issue of expansion of neighborhood boundaries toward <br />the center of the City. He noted that WNQP had come before the council a year <br />ago to discuss the concerns of local businesses and residents regarding neighbor- <br />hood boundaries. He said that at that time WNQP had agreed to postpone action <br />on this matter until the nine-member committee had made its recommendation to <br />the council. He said it was his understanding that if the ordinance before the <br />council was passed, Councilor Wooten would propose expansion of the boundaries <br />of WNQP to meet the boundaries of the Downtown Commission. He said that WNQP <br />supported the creation of the Downtown Commission. <br /> <br />Mr. Andersen then spoke as a member of the Joint Housing Committee. He said <br />that group had expressed concern in informal discussion of the matter that the <br />issue of downtown housing be addressed by the Downtown Commission. Mr. Andersen <br />said that a subcommittee of the JHC, composed of himself, John VanLandingham, <br />and Bob Linz, had met to discuss ways to bring housing issues before the commission. <br />He said this subcommittee hoped that a person with interest in housing would be <br />appointed to the Downtown Commission. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 24, 1982 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />