My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/09/1983 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1983
>
02/09/1983 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:35:38 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/9/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten supported holding a public hearing to allow the public to <br />express its view on the project, but she concurred in not wanting to commit <br />funds to pursue the project at this time. She felt the City might want to <br />pursue the project at some future time. <br /> <br />Councilor Obie said that at the time that the council had agreed to Councilor <br />Lindberg's serving on the task force, the extent of the City's involvement in <br />the project had been carefully outlined. Mr. Obie said he was personally not <br />interested in having the City pursue the matter further. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller suggested that the council discuss the matter further during a <br />council work session, perhaps at a dinner meeting. Councilors concurred with <br />this suqgestion. Mr. Whitlow said that staff would schedule this discussion <br />within the next 60 days. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindberg withdrew his motion, with the consent of the second, <br />Ms. Schue. <br /> <br />VIII. LEGISLATIVE SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 3, 1983--Approval/Decision <br />(memo, minutes distributed) <br /> <br />Ms. Schue moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to approve the February 3, <br />1983, Legislative Subcommittee minutes. <br /> <br />Councilors agreed to segregate discussion and voting on HB 2050, HB 2054, and <br />HB 2116. <br /> <br />Roll call vote on Ms. Schue's motion, with HB 2050, HB 2054, and <br />HB 2116 segregated. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Councilor Smith said that the three-member subcommittee was unable to agree on a <br />recommendation on HB 2054--20-day registration--and that the procedure was for <br />such items to be referred to the council-as-a-whole. She said that she and <br />Mr. Holmer had voted to support the bill, which called for cutting off voter <br />registration 20 days prior to elections, and that Mr. Lindberg, who had been <br />sitting in for Ms. Schue, had felt the City should oppose the bill. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to support the staff <br />recommendation for priority 2 support for HB 2054. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindberg said he believed the bill was an overreaction to the situation that <br />had occurred in the City of Antelope. He felt that obstacles should not be <br />placed in the path of people interested in voting. He felt that the proposed <br />20-day restriction would discriminate against less educated, less organized <br />citizens. <br /> <br />Councilor Holmer said it was necessary to have some type of registration cut-off <br />if the proposed vote-by-mail was to be effective. He felt that voters should be <br />informed and noted that the Voters' Pamphlet, which is intended as an information <br />tool for voters, could not be mailed to all voters unless there is a registration <br />cut-off. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 9, 1983 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.