Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />were developed with single-family dwellings and that the remaining parcels were <br />used for a trucking business, an art studio and gallery, and EWEB facilities. <br />He noted that request for consideration of the Hutchinson property as a part of <br />this request had been withdrawn. He said that staff had invited the EWEB and <br />Hansen properties to join in the request in view of their location with respect <br />to other properties involved and that they had done so. Mr. Hayes referred to a <br />letter on the request from EWEB and noted that EWEB wished to remain neutral and <br />not take sides in favor of or in opposition to the matter. He said that Tax Lot <br />4200 on the corner of the properties involved, owned by William and Patricia <br />Leonard, had been brought into the request under triple majority provisions. He <br />said that the Leonards were not opposed to the annexation and rezoning but were <br />not in a position to partition to join the request at this time. Mr. Hayes said <br />that additional written testimony in opposition to the request had been received <br />from John C. Neely, Jr., 1600 Horn Lane, subsequent to the Planning Commission <br />hearing and noted that copies of this letter had been distributed to councilors. <br /> <br />Mr. Hayes said that if the council approves the request for those properties <br />requesting C-2 Community Commercial zoning, staff recommended application of the <br />site review suffix. He noted that for the three acres owned by EWEB, staff <br />recommended R-1 Single-Family Residential zoning. Mr. Hayes said that the City <br />had an agreement with the Santa Clara Rural Fire Protection District for provision <br />of fire protection to the subject properties. Mr. Hayes suggested that the <br />council's motion include approval of a vacation now being considered by Lane <br />County of portions of Edgewood Road which had previously been dedicated as <br />public rights-of-way. <br /> <br />No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by councilors. <br /> <br />Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Speaking in support of the rezoning request: <br /> <br />Isaac E. Pankratz, 3887 North Clarey, represented area construction trades. <br />He said that if the property is annexed to the City, a large development will be <br />built, which will provide jobs for area construction workers currently experiencing <br />75- to 80-percent unemployment. He said that, once built, the development would <br />provide 200 to 250 permanent jobs in the area. He urged the council to help <br />fight the recession and create jobs by approving the request. <br /> <br />Donald Smith, 22221 East Irwin Way, represented the Carpenters' Union local for <br />the Eugene-Springfield area. He said the union supported the $6 million project <br />and felt there was an economic need for the project. He noted that the Metropol- <br />itan Area General Plan designates the subject area for commercial development. <br />He said that there was 82 to 85 percent unemployment in the carpenter's union. <br />He said the proposed annexation would help spur economic recovery for the area. <br /> <br />Dick Danielson, 1 East Broadway Mall Walk, represented the Hayden Island Corpora- <br />tion. He said his clients did not object to the application of the site review <br />suffix to the 19-acre parcel, as recommended by staff. He noted that this was a <br />voluntary annexation, sponsored by the Hayden Island Corporation. He said that <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 14, 1983 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />