Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilor Obie asked for an estimate of the total assessment to adjacent property <br />owners. Mr. Teitzel said the property owners along the improved section would <br />be paying for an equivalent 20-foot wide street (approximately $40 per front <br />foot), with the City paying for the center eight-foot section of the roadway. <br />Although the project is budgeted for $70,000, Mr. Teitzel approximated the cost <br />of the project to be $110,000, of which $90,000 would be assessed. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. No public testimony was given in favor of the <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Speaking in opposition to the proposal: <br /> <br />Joe Farmer, 1680 Lorane Highway, spokesperson for the Lorane Highway Committee, <br />stated the committee's displeasure with the proposal. He said the plans completely <br />ignore the wishes of the committee and the 94 property owners between Washington <br />Street and Chambers Street. He said it is the desire of the committee to retain <br />the unique rural atmosphere of the area. Mr. Farmer stated that the committee <br />has met with City representatives and has corresponded with Mr. Lindquist. <br />Referring to the October 6, 1983, letter from Mr. Lindquist to Mr. Teitzel, he <br />said the committee had found the school district to be in favor only of a <br />four-foot wide walkway from Fillmore to Chambers, and not in the project as <br />proposed by Mr. Teitzel and Mr. Allen. He said the committee feels that only <br />resurfacing under the City maintenance program and the installation of the <br />gravel walkway is needed. Mr. Farmer commented that communication is lacking, <br />stating that the opinions of the property owners have been ignored while the <br />project has progressed. He said the property owners recognize the need to <br />update the highway with improved shoulders and drainage and that the committee <br />has researched the issues of safety and environmental impact on the area. He <br />stated that Jan Gunn of the committee had met with Mr. Lindquist and representa- <br />tives of the district and they had agreed on a four-foot wide gravel shoulder <br />from Fillmore to Chambers, a painted crosswalk at Hionda, and appropriate <br />"School Zone" signs in the area. Mr. Farmer distributed pictures of a gravel <br />walkway on Gilham Road similar to the one proposed by the committee. He said <br />that the crosswalk as proposed by the City is inappropriately placed and would <br />require his children to cross the road twice. Mr. Farmer, distributing pictures <br />of the Hionda and Lorane Highway intersection, suggested placing a stop sign at <br />the intersection because it is a blind corner. <br /> <br />Mr. Farmer stated that increasing the width of the roadway from the present <br />20-22 foot width will add to the problems, stating that people who live along <br />newly widened roads have observed vehicle speeds to increase after the improve- <br />ments. He added that the highway is part of the Coast to Coast Bicentennial <br />Bike Route and that bikers surveyed had called for an open roadway rather than <br />the designated lanes. He said that parking is now restricted and curbs would <br />eliminate on-street parking and would create problems for vehicles entering or <br />leaving driveways. <br /> <br />Mr. Farmer said that the highway was built many years ago and has been enjoyed <br />by many people. He stated the City Engineer treats the two sections of the <br />highway differently, with Fillmore Street as the dividing line. Mr. Farmer <br />stated that the highway is similar to those found in the surrounding valleys and <br />asked the council to reexamine the facts and make an on-site inspection prior to <br />making a final decision. He stated that the property owners wished to preserve <br />the rural setting in which they had chosen to reside. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 23, 1983 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />