Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Bill 2643 was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be given <br />final passage. Roll call vote. All councilors present voting <br />aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 19145. <br /> <br />IV. <br /> <br />AWARD OF BANCROFT IMPROVEMENT SERIES "J" BONDS (memos, resolution, bid <br />tabulation distributed) <br /> <br />Mr. Whitlow introduced Warren Wong, Finance Director. Mr. Wong said that <br />financial consultants Jim Breithaupt and Bob Moore, and David Coombs, General <br />Accounting Manager, were present to respond to questions from councilors. <br />Mr. Wong noted that on April 20, 1983, the council had authorized a $3.97 million <br />bond issue. He distributed a memo documenting the bids and noted that the <br />proceeds of the bond issue would be used to pay for assessment projects. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Wong said that the bid prospectus had been sent out on May 4, 1983. He said <br />that Moody's had given the City an Aa rating, which was the highest rating a <br />municipality the size of Eugene could receive. Mr. Wong noted that this retained <br />the City's prior rating, but he indicated that it had been more difficult to <br />obtain the Aa rating this time. He said that in discussing the rating, Moody's <br />representatives had commented favorably on the City's conservative financial <br />management policies and practices, on the cash carryforward, on the decision to <br />apply revenue-sharing funds to capital or non-recurring expenditures, on the <br />decision to fund current expenditures with current revenue, and on the practice <br />of making interfund loans to support cash deficits. Mr. Wong said the City's <br />strong, anticipatory financial management, good grasp of financial issues, and <br />acceptance of short-term reductions in service and staffing to deal with revenue <br />shortfalls had also been mentioned as strong points. He said that some negative <br />points had also been cited, many of which were outside the City's control. <br />These included 1) the continued depressed state of the local economy; 2) the <br />position of the Lane County government; 3) the lack of aggressiveness in collecting <br />delinquent property taxes; and 4) the allocation formula for distribution of <br />property taxes, which calls for taxes to be distributed to jurisdictionns on the <br />basis of the Lane County average rather than on an actual basis by jurisdiction. <br />Mr. Wong listed the bids that had been received and said staff recommended awarding <br />the bid to the low bidder, First Interstate Bank of California, at a rate of <br />7.7504. <br /> <br />Councilor Holmer referred to the last sheet of the materials distributed by <br />Mr. Wong and asked how the "low bidder" had been determined, since the firm <br />offering the lowest interest rate did not offer the lowest total cost. Mr. Wong <br />responded that this difference was due to the timing of interest payments. <br />Mr. Moore added that determination of the true interest cost took into consideration <br />the time value of money. Councilor Holmer suggested that in the future the <br />council be presented with calculations detailed enough to make it clear that the <br />City was making the award to the lowest bidder. Mr. Moore noted that the bid <br />itself defined what figures the award would be based on. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 25, 1983 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />