Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> to pay fo r them. Those who did not si gn the peti tion either di d not want to be <br /> a part of any city, did not want property taxes increased by annexation, or felt <br />e annexation would result in reduced property values. He urged the council to <br /> approve the request. <br /> Robert E. Moulton. 294 Sterling, deferred his time to the other speakers. <br /> Bruce G. Johnson, 2124 Silver Lea Court, reported that he had told the Planning <br /> Commission that 80 percent of the residents would prefer to be left alone, but <br /> that this was no longer a viable option. He stated that a task force was set up <br /> to study the alternatives and had reported that annexation to the City of Eugene <br /> was the most viable remaining option. He urged the council to grant the petition. <br /> John Hoag. 2155 Dalton, said that he was in favor of the petition for reasons <br /> already stated by previous speakers. He offered to respond to obj ections frOOl <br /> councilors. <br /> Speaking in opposition: <br /> Don Williams. 107 Mayfair, said he was the chairperson of the River Road <br /> Community Organization and felt compelled to speak in opposition to the request, <br /> particularly in view of the controversy over process. He said that only a weak <br /> case had been made for refusing petitioners the right to withdraw, and noted <br /> that the date of this public hearing had been changed from July 25 to July 11, <br /> with insufficient notice to some people who wished to testify and were now on <br /> v ac at ion. He also questioned whether sufficient legal notice had been given. <br /> Mr. Williams went on to state that if withdrawals were permitted this would no <br />e longer be a triple majority petition. Noti ng that a petition for a proposed <br /> city of Santa Clara now had enough signatures for it to go to the Boundary <br /> Commission, he asked whether the City of Eugene was still the logical provider <br /> of services for this area. Mr. Williams said that he would like clarification <br /> on the likely increases in property taxes after annexation. <br /> Mr. Williams then went on to respond to Mr. Hamilton's list of services, nQting <br /> that most of them were non-issues. He said that the Santa Clara fire station <br /> would still be the closest to the area after annexation, and would probably be <br /> the provider of this service under contract to the City. He commented that the <br /> River Road Parks District was in financial trouble due to its shrinking tax base <br /> with these annexations; that Eugene's Public Works Department had a three-year <br /> waiting list for street lighting; and that sewers were going to be provided <br /> within the next few years whether or not the area was annexed. He noted that <br /> the provision of police protection was the only real issue. <br /> John Mehringer. 165 West Hilliard Lane, felt that this public hearing had not <br /> been 1 egally noticed. He urged the council to reject the petition. noting that <br /> it was not logical to annex a peninsula within the proposed city of Santa Clara <br /> at this time. He asked the council to reject the request or set aside the <br /> decision until proper notice of a hearing had been given. <br />e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 11, 1983 Page 5 <br />