09/21/1983 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lindberg, that the bill be read - the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote, the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. Ms. Schue said she was absent at the meeting when the rezoning request was originally heard but added that she had listened to the tapes and read the minutes of the meeting. She said she was prepared to vote on the issue. Mr. Holmer said he had listened to the tapes of the meeting and was prepared to vote on the issue. Council Bill 2682 was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lindberg, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed (and became Ordinance No. 19180). E. Referral Response for Annexation Request (Beall/Walker) (AI 83-8) (memo, map attached; background information distributed) Mr. Gleason introduced the agenda item, stating that this is an unusual procedure in that the request went directly to the Boundary Review Commission because of the desire by the applicants to be considered as part of the River Road Annexation proposal. In response to a question, Planning Commission staffperson Tom Hayes stated that e the request does not require a public hearing before the Planning Commission or the City Council. He said the request was submitted directly to the Boundary Commission within the guidelines of ORS 199. He said the Boundary Commission requested the City coordinate the review of the request among the City depart- ments, EWEB, and the 4-J School District. He said that this was accomplished and a response to the Boundary Commission has been prepared for approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council. He further explained that the process is unusual in that it has remonstrance, allowing any residents within the area to be annexed 45 days to take legal steps beyond the Boundary Commission decision. He said that the request is voluntary and has the consent of 100 percent of the residents in the area. He said the Boundary Commission will hear the request on October 6, 1983. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lindberg, to forward the referral for annexation of property located south of Corliss Lane, east of River Road, to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission for consideration at its October 6, 1983, meeting. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. III. DAY CARE AND GROUP CARE CODE AMENDMENTS (memo, background information, ordinance distributed) Mr. Gleason introduced the agenda item, stating that it is a rediscussion of the item on which a public hearing was already held. He said the council had e MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 21, 1983 Page 5