Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br /> Residential District to MU-R Whiteaker Mixed-Use District, and <br />e change of sign district from Residential and Industrial to Pro- <br /> fessional-Office (City of Eugene: MU-R Whiteaker Residential Mixed- <br /> Use District) (Z 83-5) (Area 3) (map, background information <br /> distributed) <br /> Mr. Gleason introduced the agenda item. Jim Croteau of the Planning Department <br /> presented the staff report, stating that the item had been referred to the <br /> Planning Commission and had been before the council in June 1983. He explained <br /> that Ms. Davis had two tax lots, but only one was in the mixed-use area. <br /> He said the Planning Commission had heard Ms. Davis's request and had recom- <br /> mended that both tax lots be excluded from the mixed-use area. Mr. Croteau <br /> explained that the zone change had been initiated in response to a policy set <br /> forth in the Whiteaker Refinement Plan of 1977 which called for three mixed-use <br /> areas. He said the City, working with the Land Use and Site Review Committee of <br /> the Whiteaker Community Council, had decided to write a special mixed-use <br /> district that emphasized high-density residential development and encouraged <br /> complementary neighborhood-scale commercial use. Mr. Croteau said that staff <br /> had sent letters to the property owners in the area in February 1983, explaining <br /> that under special circumstances the staff would do the paperwork and recommend <br /> the zone change to the Planning Commission for those owners who wanted to be <br /> included in the mixed-use area. He said that of the 190 letters sent out, 31 <br /> replies were received. Mr. Croteau referred to a letter from Micheal Brock who <br /> owned tax lot 14100. He said that Mr. Brock was requesting that his property, <br /> having first been excluded, be included in the mixed-use zoning. He said that <br /> tax lot 14100 had been rezoned to R-2/10A in 1980 as supported by the Whiteaker <br />e Refinement Plan. He stated that Ms. Mulder was present to answer any questions <br /> of the council and added that any change in the Planning Commission recommenda- <br /> tion would require a joint meeting of the City Council and the Planning Commission. <br /> In response to a question by Ms. Schue, Mr. Croteau said that Mr. Brock's <br /> property had been included in the recommendation when it originally went before <br /> the Planning Commission, but that the commission had excluded it from the <br /> rezoning request. He said that Mr. Brock was now requesting that his property <br /> be included in the mixed-use district. <br /> There were no statements of ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest. The <br /> staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. <br /> Public hearing was opened. <br /> Della Davis, 196 Monroe Street, Eugene, said she did not understand the rezoning. <br /> She said the property in the area was a combination of residential, mixed use, <br /> and light industrial uses. She said she did not understand why all property <br /> north of the Southern Pacific railroad tracks and east of Adams Street could not <br /> be zoned MU-R Whiteaker Mixed Use. She said that her first request on the form <br /> sent out by the Planning Commission was for mixed-use, but she said that she had <br /> received a letter from the Planning Commission which stated only one of her lots <br /> would be included. She said that she had requested that both lots be similarly <br /> zoned and that she would prefer that both lots to be zoned mixed-use due to the <br /> better opportunity for sale of the property. <br />- <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 26, 1983 Page 9 <br />