Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />the committee was unable to reach consensus on a recommendation to the City <br />Council. He said the committee was not able to complete its assignments due to <br />lack of time, stating that the committee dealt only with the concerns on realign- <br />ment and tree loss. He said the committee is at an impasse regarding the option <br />of a 40-foot, three-lane roadway in the downtown area and a four-lane widening <br />for the Charnel ton to Lawrence Street section. He said committee members favor <br />a variety of options based on the individual concerns of the members, but no <br />consensus was reached. He felt that the committee could reach a solution given <br />more time. He said the committee is urging the council to provide that time. <br />He added that the future phases of the widening project will also need review. <br />In stating his own views, Mr. Bauske felt the 40-foot, three-lane option is <br />appropriate where it proves workable and necessary to save the trees--more <br />specifically, between Charnel ton and Lawrence on 6th Avenue. He said problems <br />would occur with realignment of the roadway to either the north or south on 6th <br />Avenue to construct a four-lane section. He said a three-lane section in the <br />Charnel ton to Lawrence Street section and four-lanes everywhere else would move <br />traffic well and would save all but two major trees. He said he would also <br />support a 46-foot, four-lane design which recreates the Gateway Arch as soon as <br />possible. <br /> <br />In response to a question, Mr. Bauske said the charge given by the Planning <br />Commission was for the Design Review Committee to include study of a three-lane <br />section. In response to another question, he stated that a four-lane weave <br />option could be accomplished without any additional right-of-way, with the <br />possible exception of the area on 7th Avenue adjacent to the Federal Building. <br />Ms. Decker stated that an easement for planting new trees on the north side of <br />6th Avenue would be necessary at the Gateway Arch area if the weaving occurred. <br />Mr. Bauske said that preliminary study showed this option to be feasible. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie temporarily left the meeting at this time. <br /> <br />In response to a question, Mr. Bauske said that while ODOT did not make any <br />commitment, indications appeared that there would not be any delay with the <br />construction due to design changes. Mr. Holmer stated he would support a <br />follow-up design review, but not at the expense of the project. Mr. Bauske said <br />it was his understanding that a review could occur without delaying the project. <br />Ms. Decker said ODOT has assumed that the council will take action that evening <br />or on January 25 and will continue to work with a Design Review Committee <br />on the other issues identified but not yet resolved. <br /> <br />As another member of the Design Review Committee, Mr. Hansen said Mr. Bauske <br />accurately reflected the activities of the committee. He agreed that conflicts <br />existed but some conclusions were reached. <br /> <br />In response to a question, Mr. Bauske said the committee is entirely sure of <br />the requirements for a three-lane alternative; one concern is that some of the <br />blocks on 7th Avenue were already widened and striped for four lanes. He said <br />the committee has not had enough time to deal with that option. Ms. Wooten said <br />the memorandum from the Public Works and Planning Departments stated that the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 23, 1984 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />