04/02/1984 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e e - $100,000 which would be offset by private donations and the room tax. He said that the majority of the donations mentioned by the foundation at that time have proven to be very tentative. Briefly reviewing the donations. Mr. Heusel stated that the end result was that the City cannot depend on the EAF for funding because of its financial difficulties. He felt the City has failed to monitor the Eugene Arts Foundation and what was to have been 25 percent of the offsetting revenue for the Hult Center. Mr. Heusel felt that the Hult Center must survive in order to lure industry into Eugene. but he suggested that any donations be sent directly to the City of Eugene, thereby saving the 30 percent used by the foundation for its own operations. George V. Stathakis. 830 Hilyard, stated that while he was in favor of support- ing the Hult Center. the report has not mentioned the source of the support or given any assurance that the support will not come from basic services. He said the City Council should present a definite financial plan and assure the citizens that the shortfall will not affect basic services. He felt that the WOW Hall should continue to receive the room tax money, stating that it is also part of the arts community. Mr. Stathakis suggested that the management of the Hult Center should be opened to competitive bidding to relieve the City of that burden. He also stressed that efforts should be made to rid the City of its snob image by becoming more involved with the citizens who need employment. Also speaking in support of the task force's recommendations: Camilla Pratt. 375 Broken Oak. complimented the task force on its recommenda- tions for the room tax moneys. stating that she felt the proposals were fair. She stated that some of the testimony presented had angered her. stressing that it was irresponsible to suggest that the City turn its back on a major capital investment because of a few management errors. She stated that many people still supported the center even though they were not present at the hearing. She stated that the issue was one of priorities. explaining that many people spend an amount comparable to the cost of tickets on alcohol and movies. She did not think the ticket prices were the main issue. She sug- gested that more effort be placed in developing the market outside Eugene. She stated that destination-point tourism. of which the Hult Center was key. was a factor in the development of Eugene as a convention center. As the general manager of a chamber orchestra. she stated that she has enjoyed performing in the Soreng Theater and that the group's audience has increased due to the relocation. There being no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. The meeting was recessed at 9:04 and reconvened at 9:15 p.m. Councilor Wooten, responding to the testimony presented. stated that Hult Center Executive Director Dick Reynolds had commented on the subject of cable and satellite hookups for the center at the first task force public hearing. Mr. Reynolds had stated that a market for the Hult Center shows was not currently available and that the proposal was not cost-effective. Ms. Wooten stated that she would support any effort to explore this option. but she stressed the factor that it was not currently financially feasible. Referring MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 2. 1984 Page 8