Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />D. Call for Public Hearings to Consider Abatements at 5300 Fox Hollow <br />Road and 1329 Rutledge Street (memos distributed) <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason requested that both resolutions calling for <br />public hearings concerning abatement issues be held over until April 18. <br />This action was in agreement with the City Council. <br /> <br />At 12:44 p.m. the meeting of the Eugene City Council was adjourned to a <br />meeting of the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Eugene. Mayor Keller <br />opened the meeting. <br /> <br />III. DOWNTOWN RETAIL EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT (memo, resolution <br />background distributed) <br /> <br />Councilor Hansen stated that the issue had been raised whether he had conflicts <br />of interest in the downtown retail activities. While he did not believe that <br />he had any such conflicts, he felt it would be best to abstain in the Dresent <br />and any future issues regarding the extensions of contracts with the Price <br />organization but would continue to ask questions in the discussion of such <br />issues. Mayor Keller believed Mr. Hansen could not participate in the discus- <br />sion if he chose to abstain from the issue. City Attorney Les Swanson stated <br />that he did not believe Mr. Hansen to have any conflict of interest in the issue <br />although he said he understood the feeling behind Mr. Hansenls actions. He felt <br />that allowing Mr. Hansen to continue to participate in the discussion while he <br />abstained was a matter of council protocol. Again, he said he felt that there <br />was no legal impediment to Mr. Hansen participating in the council action. Mr. <br />Obie stated that Mr. Hansen's position might be different from the historical <br />practice since he did not have any true conflict. He asked Mr. Hansen to <br />clarify if he planned to abstain from all issues involving the downtown. Mr. <br />Hansen responded that he would participate in those issues not involving the <br />commercial aspects of the downtown, but he believed that any statements he might <br />make regarding the development of a downtown shopping center would be construed <br />as containing other motives. He believed that the company selected by the City <br />to develop the shopping center was quite competent. Mr. Hansen stated that he <br />will abstain from the action. <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. Elaine Stewart of <br />the Eugene Development Department presented the staff report, stating that the <br />modification before the Eugene Renewal Agency was the next step in the downtown <br />retail development process. While the development could take up to four <br />years, she stated that this proposal was for the second six-month period to <br />perform the terms of the modification as outlined in the April 6, 1984, Downtown <br />Commission memorandum to the Urban Renewal Agency. She stated that negotiations <br />for the disposition and the development of the property will begin after suc- <br />cessful completion of the modification terms. <br /> <br />James McCoy, Chair of the Downtown Commission, stated that the DC had voted <br />unanimously in support of the modification of the negotiation agreement. <br />He said the DC was pleased with the favorable results of the feasibility <br />study conducted during the first six months and was ready to move forward. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 11, 1984 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />