Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />CB 2738--An ordinance concerning parking; amending Sections <br />5.010, 5.285, and 5.540 of the Eugene Code, 1971; adding <br />a new Section 5.240 to that code; and providing an <br />effective date. <br /> <br />CB 2739--An ordinance declaring unlawful business practices <br />for owners of parking facilities and towing and vehicle <br />storage businesses; providing remedies; adding Sections <br />4.980, 4.981, 4.982, 4.983, 4.984, 4.985, and 4.987 to <br />the Eugene Code, 1971; amending Section 4.990 of that <br />code; and declaring an emergency. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Wooten, that the bills be read the <br />second time by council bill numbers only, with unanimous consent <br />of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten thanked Mr. Holmer and the members of the committee for their <br />work. She hoped that it would not be necessary to spend as much time on the <br />issue in the future. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilor Hansen stated he had concerns with the ordinances as proposed, stating <br />that he sympathized with the property owners and the towing companies. He did <br />not feel the towing companies should take the abuse for a decision taken by the <br />property owners. He was also concerned with the proposed $500 fine for improper <br />signing when the problem existed of signs being torn down. He felt that the <br />ordinance should address the proper posting of signs but should not require <br />property owners to weekly install signs destroyed or removed. In regard to the <br />property posting of signs, Mr. Hansen said the letter received from Rick LeBrun <br />raised the issue of establishing requirements for parking in landlord/tenant <br />relations. He felt that some confrontations beyond the City's need for control <br />of the towing situation will be created by the ordinance. In regard to problems <br />related to parking by visitors to Eugene, he felt that more effort should be <br />placed on that issue rather than assisting those individuals illegally parked. <br />He stated that he did not have any sympathy for the offender. <br /> <br />Councilor Schue stated that it was a difficult issue to address all the problems <br />involved. She felt the City could not be responsible for the "1ack of charm" <br />or lack of politeness by the general public. Ms. Schue felt that the ordinance <br />will help the problem. She said adding the hours of towing to the signs will <br />warn the public of the consequences. She felt the ordinances were the best <br />compromise under the circumstances. She recognized that the City will receive <br />complaints about the lack of response from the Police Department on issuing <br />citations, but she said the property owner could still have the vehicle towed if <br />the property was properly signed. <br /> <br />Councilor Hansen stated that while he did not have any problem supporting <br />Council Bill 2738 which amended the current parking ordinances, he felt the <br />areas of attachment and fees charged in Council Bill 2739 will raise problems. <br />He asked that the motion on the ordinances be separated so that his concerns <br />with the second ordinance could be addressed. Mayor Keller stated that he would <br />separate the motion on the ordinances. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 23, 1984 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />