My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/25/1984 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1984
>
04/25/1984 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:05:11 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:44:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/25/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />Councilor Ball stated that he felt substantial progress was made at the April <br />23 meeting with DEQ in regards to the scheduling of the sewer implementation. <br />He felt that both sides were working toward a resolution of the issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason stated that staff was keeping in mind the request by council to <br />balance for the existing citizens of the metropolitan area to ensure that any <br />solution would not place a burden on one particular group to subsidizing <br />another. <br /> <br />VI. INTENTION TO APPEAL COUNTY LAND USE DECISION (memo and background <br />information distributed) <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. He recommended that <br />the council consider entering into executive session to discuss the details of <br />the item. He stated that the refinement plan for the River Road/Santa <br />Clara area currently underway dealt with several land use issues, including <br />the strip commercial problems in the area and the desire to create commercial <br />nodes. Mr. Gleason stated that the Lane County Planning Commission, the <br />respective staffs, and the Citizen Advisory Team had each recommended that any <br />decision on the appeal be delayed until the refinement process was completed. <br />Based on the decision by the Lane County Board of Commissioners to grant the <br />rezoning, he stated that the City had filed an appeal of the action with <br />the Land Use Board of Appeals as being inconsistent with the General Plan and <br />ordinances adopted by the City Council. Mr. Gleason stated that he has <br />discussed the issue with Lane County staff, including the option of condition- <br />ally zoning the land in question. He stated that the technical application of <br />the appeal has to be reviewed by the City Attorney. He stated that Jim Farah <br />of the Planning Department was present to answer any questions of council on <br />the issue. City Attorney Tim Sercombe stated that he could answer questions <br />on the general policies involved but that any detailed discussion of the issue <br />should be done in executive session. <br /> <br />In response to a question, Mr. Sercombe stated that the Hearings Official had <br />decided against the rezoning in both situations and that the City had appeared <br />before the Lane County Board of Commissioners in support of that decision. <br />Mr. Sercombe then reviewed the process and basis of the appeal as outlined in <br />the April 20, 1984, Planning Department and City Attorney's Office memorandum <br />to the City Council and the Planning Commission. In response to another <br />question, Mr. Farah stated that the application for rezoning was originally <br />made on March 21, 1983. <br /> <br />Councilor Hansen asked if the county had agreed not to perform any zone <br />changes until the City had prepared a refinement plan for the area. Mr. <br />Sercombe stated that the Planning Department position was that the General <br />Plan required that commercial activities be done in centers rather than strip <br />development and that the City plan off-street commercial nodes. He explained <br />that those siting decisions could be performed according to the plan either by <br />siting the commercial centers through the refinement process or through <br />incremental decisions. He said the Planning Department believed that any <br />siting should occur through a refinement plan process and that standards be <br />adopted in advance for any incremental siting. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 25, 1984 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.