Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />that the present piles were made after the posting by staff. He said that <br />Di amac, Inc. had an agreement with Southern Pacifi c to fi 11 the area and pl ant <br />Christmas trees. Mr. Bevans stated that staff was relying on the code language <br />to define any unsightly debris as a nuisance. He countered that Section 6.010(c) <br />provided no objective basis for determining the term "unsightly." He suggested <br />that the language was attempting to define such debris as decomposing animal and <br />vegetable matter as a health hazard, adding that such language would include all <br />garden compost piles. With regard to the issue of the height stacking requirement, <br />Mr. Bevans stated that the piles were temporary and should not be addressed. <br /> <br />There being no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten asked for clarification between the piles of wood and other <br />debris. Mr. Reed stated that three of the areas had been cleaned up in com- <br />pliance with the code but that three other areas were still unsightly and rat <br />harbors as defined by the code. He said the seventh area, Area F, had been <br />improved but still contained items that had been dumped into the drainage <br />way. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to abate the nuisances as <br />described by staff and adopt the findings contained in the orders <br />To Abate Nuisance of May 17, 1984. Roll call vote; the motion <br />carried unanimously: 6:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Hansen stated that he had made a tour of the area and he agreed that <br />other areas in the city were not in compliance with the ordinance. He urged <br />staff to work on bringing the other areas into compliance as well. In response <br />to a question by Ms. Wooten, Mr. Reed stated that the individual has 10 days to <br />abate the public nuisance as stipulated by Section 6.985 or the City would <br />remove the nuisance and bill the owners. <br /> <br />III. CONSIDERATION OF HEARINGS OFFICIAL FINDINGS/LEVYING ASSESSMENTS <br /> <br />A. Hearings Official Findings of June 4, 1984 (memo distributed) <br /> <br />B. Levying Assessments <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda items. There was no staff <br />report on the items. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to approve the Hearings <br />Official IS findings of June 4, 1984. Roll call vote; the motion <br />carried unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br />CB 2750--An ordinance levying assessments for paving, sanitary <br />sewer, storm sewer, and sidewalk on Oanebo Avenue from <br />Royal Avenue to'11th Avenue. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be <br />read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous <br />consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this <br />time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />June 11, 1984 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />