Laserfiche WebLink
<br />> <br /> <br />Jan. 18, 1985 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />FROM: Mike Gleason, City Manager <br /> <br />RE: Gypsy Moth Issue <br /> <br />STATUS: The Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) Gypsy Moth Steering <br />Committee has submitted to the ODA Director its recommendations on <br />the alternatives available for control of the Lane County infestation. <br />Following a series of public hearings, the Director will select and initiate <br />a treatment program. Under separate cover are staff memorandum, maps and <br />copies of the ODA proposed recommendations to assist the Council in <br />deciding whether to take a position, and if so, what position to take in <br />this controversy. <br /> <br />According to most recent information, the Lane County Board of <br />Commissioners will not be taking a position on this year's treatment <br />program, but will rather focus its attention on long term solutions <br />to this ongoing problem. The County is aggressively seeking to locate <br />a Bt manufacturing plant within the area and is coordinating that <br />effort with Eugene's BATeam, the. Oregon Department of Economic Development <br />and OSU. ~ <br /> <br />4It. <br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The treatment. controversy has become highly visible <br />and emotional. There is a marked lack of agreement among the experts on both <br />the potential effectiveness of Bt for the eradication of this, the <br />largest infestation west of the Rocky Mountains, and the predicable <br />health risks of chemical agents. <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the Council not adopt a position at this time. <br />If Council wishes to adopt and present a position at the Jan. 31st <br />ODA hearing, staff recommends: <br />1) that the position be focused on treatment within the Eugene city <br />limits, and <br />2) that it support the ODA's proposed recommendations, including <br />aerial applications of Bt over the larger area and limited use <br />of Orthene by ground application only in the 8 acre Franklin <br />and 30 acre Hawkins Heights areas. <br /> <br />REASONING: The recommended treatment within the Eugene city limits <br />involves primarily Bt, the use of which has generated little dissent. <br />The recommended ground application of Orthene on 38 acres is a very <br />controlled use of a common garden pesticide. A cautious chemical application <br />such as this, in conjunction with the broader applications of Bt, presents an <br />approach which is as close to ideal as possible in this difficult situation. <br />The proposed aerial application of Dimilin in the Pleasant Hill area, on <br />hand, is a highly controversial question which staff recommends Council ~ <br />not address until more scientific conclusions are available. ~ <br />