My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/28/1985 Meeting (2)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1985
>
01/28/1985 Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:32:36 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:47:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/28/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />8) Before proceeding with the Beltline Extension project, conduct a <br />study of the transportation needs of the Willow Creek area. In addition, <br />the Beltline Extension project should be included in the Metro Plan and <br />the Metropolitan Transportation Plan before implementation. <br /> <br />Further Recommendations for the Next CIP Update <br /> <br />In preparfng the next annual CIP Update, the Planning Commission in responding <br />to concerns raised in the review process, suggested reorganizing the document <br />to provide two Appendix sections. <br /> <br />The first section would consist of expanded project descriptions which would <br />include more detailed information on all of the projects (this could be <br />similar to Attachment B). Examples of information provided in the expanded <br />descriptions would include: <br /> <br />--roots/origin of each project; e.g., what plan or policy identifies the <br />project as a need; <br /> <br />--greater detail on the limits and specifics of the project; e.g., how <br />many lanes, descriptions of studies, when proposed, etc. <br /> <br />--reasons why the project limits or title may have changed, and what the <br />previous limits and title were. <br /> <br />Other testimony and comments on the Draft CIP have related to the need for an <br />Appendix which would summarize the status of projects contained in the,first <br />year of the previous CIP, specifically, the relation of the first year <br />proj ects to the City Budget. It is recommended that such a report (an <br />attainment report) be included as a second Appendix section in future CIPs: <br />This section could resemble Attachment A. <br /> <br />The final recommendation for the next CIP Update is to place more emphasis at <br />the staff level on developing operating cost information which would be <br />included in the draft document. <br /> <br />plkmcit3 <br /> <br />Attached under separate cover: <br /> <br />Attachment A: Attainment Report <br />Attachment B: Special Project Notes <br />Minutes from December 4 Planning Commission public hearing <br />Minutes and staff notes from January 7 Planning Commission meeting <br />Letter from Jim Hale, Chair of MAPAC <br />Memorandum from the Downtown Commission <br />Letter from Randall Hledick <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.