Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />Council Bill 2805 was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, that the bill be <br />approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all <br />councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed <br />(and became Ordinance No. 19307). <br /> <br />BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT FUND LOAN REQUEST~memo attached) <br /> <br />IV. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason said the Business Development Fund Loan Advisory <br />Committee recommended a loan to a firm in which a principal is a City <br />employee. Regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development <br />require the council to be aware of the loan. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Erhman, Mr. Gleason said the $10,000 loan <br />will purchase a computer for the company. The committee which reviews loan <br />applications recommended it. Ms. Erhman thought there might be an appearance <br />of impropriety because the loan will have a favorable interest rate. <br />Mr. Holmer shared her concern. He would like a policy prohibiting loans to <br />businesses in which a City employee is a principal. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan pointed out no council action was required on the loan. The <br />council simply had to acknowledge that the loan was made. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason discussed the history of the business development loan program <br />and said the council decided that the committee should consider the fiduciary <br />responsibility of businesses and the economic development goals of the <br />community when making decisions. If the council wished to change the policy, <br />that action should be separated from the acknowledgement required by Federal <br />regulations of this loan. He did not feel there was any impropriety in this <br />loan. <br /> <br />Ms. Erhman suggested the matter be scheduled for additional discussion by the <br />council. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen said City employees are also citizens. They should not get <br />preferential treatment, but he wondered if a prohibition against their <br />receiving loans would not eventually extend to people on City committees and <br />boards. He was comfortable with the loan. He suggested the council review <br />all the loan programs of the City and the council role in them. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten pointed out the loan was approved by the Loan Advisory Committee, <br />the applicant fulfilled the requirements, and the council wished to discuss a <br />policy concerning City loans to City employees and review all the City loan <br />policies. Ms. Wooten suggested Mr. Smith report on what the City has in <br />addition to business loans. <br /> <br />The meeting was recessed briefly at 12:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten reconvened the Eugene City Council in a work session in the McNutt <br />Room at 12:50 p.m. She announced the postponement of consideration of <br />~ business license revisions (Item VI on the agenda). <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 30, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />